From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] block: Make SCSI device suspend work reliably
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:25:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170912162513.GC21349@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170908235226.26622-5-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 04:52:25PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Instead of allowing request allocation to succeed for suspended
> request queues and only to process power management requests, make
> blk_get_request() wait until the request queue is resumed for
> requests that are not power management requests.
>
> This patch avoids that resume does not occur if the maximum queue
> depth is reached when a power management request is submitted.
>
> Note: this patch affects the behavior of scsi_device_quiesce() only
> if that function is called from inside a power management callback.
> This patch does not affect the behavior of scsi_device_quiesce()
> when a call of that function is triggered by writing "quiesce" into
> /sys/class/scsi_device/*/device/state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> block/blk.h | 12 ++++++++++
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index bb53c6b58e8c..cd2700c763ed 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -1325,6 +1325,24 @@ static struct request *__get_request(struct request_list *rl, unsigned int op,
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static bool blk_wait_until_active(struct request_queue *q, bool wait)
> + __releases(q->queue_lock)
> + __acquires(q->queue_lock)
> +{
> + if (wait)
> + wait_event_lock_irq(q->rpm_active_wq,
> + q->rpm_status == RPM_ACTIVE,
> + *q->queue_lock);
> + return q->rpm_status == RPM_ACTIVE;
If runtime PM is disabled via /sys/.../power/control, q->rpm_status
can be always ACTIVE, even during system suspend, then you can't
prevent any new request allocation at that time.
--
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-12 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-08 23:52 [PATCH 0/5] Make SCSI device suspend work reliably Bart Van Assche
2017-09-08 23:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] percpu-refcount: Introduce percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_nowait() Bart Van Assche
2017-09-11 8:42 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-09-11 16:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-11 13:13 ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-11 16:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-11 16:37 ` tj
2017-09-11 16:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-11 17:20 ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-11 17:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-08 23:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] scsi: Change the type of the second last argument of scsi_execute() Bart Van Assche
2017-09-08 23:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] block: Introduce REQ_PM and remove RQF_PM Bart Van Assche
2017-09-08 23:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] block: Make SCSI device suspend work reliably Bart Van Assche
2017-09-12 2:29 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-12 15:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-12 16:10 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-12 16:25 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-09-08 23:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] blk-mq: Implement power management support Bart Van Assche
2017-09-12 9:14 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-09 10:39 ` [PATCH 0/5] Make SCSI device suspend work reliably Ming Lei
2017-09-11 16:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-12 2:17 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170912162513.GC21349@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).