From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 02/14] sbitmap: introduce __sbitmap_for_each_set()
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:18:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170914151822.GA15813@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170914145943.GA10238@vader>
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 07:59:43AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
[snip]
> Honestly I prefer your original patch with a comment on depth += nr. I'd
> be happy with the following incremental patch on top of your original v4
> patch.
Oh, and the change renaming the off parameter to start would be good to
include, too.
> diff --git a/include/linux/sbitmap.h b/include/linux/sbitmap.h
> index 2329b9e1a0e2..8d747048ae4f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sbitmap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sbitmap.h
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ typedef bool (*sb_for_each_fn)(struct sbitmap *, unsigned int, void *);
>
> /**
> * sbitmap_for_each_set() - Iterate over each set bit in a &struct sbitmap.
> - * @off: Where to start the iteration
> + * @off: Where to start the iteration.
> * @sb: Bitmap to iterate over.
> * @fn: Callback. Should return true to continue or false to break early.
> * @data: Pointer to pass to callback.
> @@ -230,11 +230,16 @@ static inline void __sbitmap_for_each_set(struct sbitmap *sb,
> unsigned int off,
> sb_for_each_fn fn, void *data)
> {
> - unsigned int index = SB_NR_TO_INDEX(sb, off);
> - unsigned int nr = SB_NR_TO_BIT(sb, off);
> + unsigned int index;
> + unsigned int nr;
> unsigned int scanned = 0;
>
> - while (1) {
> + if (off >= sb->depth)
> + off = 0;
> + index = SB_NR_TO_INDEX(sb, off);
> + nr = SB_NR_TO_BIT(sb, off);
> +
> + while (scanned < sb->depth) {
> struct sbitmap_word *word = &sb->map[index];
> unsigned int depth = min_t(unsigned int, word->depth - nr,
> sb->depth - scanned);
> @@ -243,6 +248,11 @@ static inline void __sbitmap_for_each_set(struct sbitmap *sb,
> if (!word->word)
> goto next;
>
> + /*
> + * On the first iteration of the outer loop, we need to add the
> + * bit offset back to the size of the word for find_next_bit().
> + * On all other iterations, nr is zero, so this is a noop.
> + */
> depth += nr;
> off = index << sb->shift;
> while (1) {
> @@ -254,9 +264,7 @@ static inline void __sbitmap_for_each_set(struct sbitmap *sb,
>
> nr++;
> }
> - next:
> - if (scanned >= sb->depth)
> - break;
> +next:
> nr = 0;
> if (++index >= sb->map_nr)
> index = 0;
> @@ -268,9 +276,6 @@ static inline void __sbitmap_for_each_set(struct sbitmap *sb,
> * @sb: Bitmap to iterate over.
> * @fn: Callback. Should return true to continue or false to break early.
> * @data: Pointer to pass to callback.
> - *
> - * This is inline even though it's non-trivial so that the function calls to the
> - * callback will hopefully get optimized away.
> */
> static inline void sbitmap_for_each_set(struct sbitmap *sb, sb_for_each_fn fn,
> void *data)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-14 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-02 15:17 [PATCH V4 00/14] blk-mq-sched: improve SCSI-MQ performance Ming Lei
2017-09-02 15:17 ` [PATCH V4 01/14] blk-mq-sched: fix scheduler bad performance Ming Lei
2017-09-08 20:48 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-09-08 20:54 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-09-08 20:56 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-09-09 7:43 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-09 7:33 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-02 15:17 ` [PATCH V4 02/14] sbitmap: introduce __sbitmap_for_each_set() Ming Lei
2017-09-08 20:43 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-09-09 9:38 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-10 17:20 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-09-11 4:08 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-13 18:37 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-09-14 1:56 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-14 14:59 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-09-14 15:18 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2017-09-15 1:57 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-02 15:17 ` [PATCH V4 03/14] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_dispatch_rq_from_ctx() Ming Lei
2017-09-15 0:04 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-09-15 1:50 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-02 15:17 ` [PATCH V4 04/14] blk-mq-sched: move actual dispatching into one helper Ming Lei
2017-09-19 19:21 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-09-02 15:17 ` [PATCH V4 05/14] blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue Ming Lei
2017-09-08 23:54 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-09-10 4:45 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-10 17:38 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-09-11 4:13 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-13 17:32 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-09-19 20:37 ` Jens Axboe
2017-09-20 2:37 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-20 12:20 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-22 2:15 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-02 15:17 ` [PATCH V4 06/14] blk-mq-sched: don't dequeue request until all in ->dispatch are flushed Ming Lei
2017-09-19 19:11 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-09-20 2:55 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-02 15:17 ` [PATCH V4 07/14] blk-mq-sched: introduce blk_mq_sched_queue_depth() Ming Lei
2017-09-02 15:17 ` [PATCH V4 08/14] blk-mq-sched: use q->queue_depth as hint for q->nr_requests Ming Lei
2017-09-02 15:17 ` [PATCH V4 09/14] block: introduce rqhash helpers Ming Lei
2017-09-02 15:17 ` [PATCH V4 10/14] block: move actual bio merge code into __elv_merge Ming Lei
2017-09-02 15:17 ` [PATCH V4 11/14] block: add check on elevator for supporting bio merge via hashtable from blk-mq sw queue Ming Lei
2017-09-02 15:17 ` [PATCH V4 12/14] block: introduce .last_merge and .hash to blk_mq_ctx Ming Lei
2017-09-02 15:17 ` [PATCH V4 13/14] blk-mq-sched: refactor blk_mq_sched_try_merge() Ming Lei
2017-09-02 15:17 ` [PATCH V4 14/14] blk-mq: improve bio merge from blk-mq sw queue Ming Lei
2017-09-04 9:12 ` [PATCH V4 00/14] blk-mq-sched: improve SCSI-MQ performance Paolo Valente
2017-09-05 1:39 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-06 15:27 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 19:25 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-09-20 3:18 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170914151822.GA15813@vader \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox