From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"loberman@redhat.com" <loberman@redhat.com>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] dm-mpath: return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE in case of rq allocation failure
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:41:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170919144130.GA22469@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170917132318.GD6289@ming.t460p>
On Sun, Sep 17 2017 at 9:23am -0400,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 04:06:55PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 15 2017 at 1:29pm -0400,
> > Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2017-09-16 at 00:44 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > blk-mq will rerun queue via RESTART after one request is completion,
> > > > so not necessary to wait random time for requeuing, it should trust
> > > > blk-mq to do it.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/md/dm-mpath.c | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > > > index 96aedaac2c64..f5a1088a6e79 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > > > @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static int multipath_clone_and_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct request *rq,
> > > > atomic_inc(&m->pg_init_in_progress);
> > > > activate_or_offline_path(pgpath);
> > > > }
> > > > - return DM_MAPIO_DELAY_REQUEUE;
> > > > + return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE;
> > > > }
> > > > clone->bio = clone->biotail = NULL;
> > > > clone->rq_disk = bdev->bd_disk;
> > >
> > > So you are reverting the patch below? Thank you very much.
> > >
> > > commit 1c23484c355ec360ca2f37914f8a4802c6baeead
> > > Author: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
> > > Date: Wed Aug 9 11:32:12 2017 -0700
> > >
> > > dm mpath: do not lock up a CPU with requeuing activity
> > >
> > > When using the block layer in single queue mode, get_request()
> > > returns ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN) if the queue is dying and the REQ_NOWAIT
> > > flag has been passed to get_request(). Avoid that the kernel
> > > reports soft lockup complaints in this case due to continuous
> > > requeuing activity.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 7083abbbf ("dm mpath: avoid that path removal can trigger an infinite loop")
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
> > > Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> >
> > The problem is that multipath_clone_and_map() is now treated as common
> > code (thanks to both blk-mq and old .request_fn now enjoying the use of
> > blk_get_request) BUT: Ming please understand that this code is used by
> > old .request_fn too. So it would seem that the use of
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> OK, thanks for pointing this out.
>
> > DM_MAPIO_DELAY_REQUEUE vs DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE needs to be based on dm-sq vs
> > dm-mq.
>
> Yeah, just forget that dm-mq can't work on underlying queue which is
> block legacy path, also forget the exact reason, :-(
Not sure how that detail is relevant to your patch?
But here are the 2 patches I posted as RFC to eliminate the restriction:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9839565/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9839567/
In the end I'm not too interested in supporting blk-mq multipath ontop
of block legacy path. But I'd revisit if hch or someone else posted the
blk-mq patch that "removed the ->complete handler" (as hch mentions in
the thread of the first patchwork patch I reference above).
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-19 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-15 16:44 [PATCH 0/5] dm-mpath: improve I/O schedule Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE Ming Lei
2017-09-15 17:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-17 12:40 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-18 15:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 5:43 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 15:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 15:56 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 16:04 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 16:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:55 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 18:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 22:44 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 23:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 23:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-20 1:13 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-20 1:19 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 15:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 15:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-19 16:03 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-19 16:07 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] dm-mpath: return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE in case of rq allocation failure Ming Lei
2017-09-15 17:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 20:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-15 20:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-17 13:23 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-19 14:41 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2017-09-19 15:56 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-17 12:51 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] dm-mpath: remove annoying message of 'blk_get_request() returned -11' Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] block: export blk_update_nr_requests Ming Lei
2017-09-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] dm-mpath: improve I/O schedule Ming Lei
2017-09-15 20:10 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-15 20:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 21:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-15 21:42 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170919144130.GA22469@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).