From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"loberman@redhat.com" <loberman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm-mpath: return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE in case of rq allocation failure
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 01:44:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170922174431.GA21108@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1506092775.2512.5.camel@wdc.com>
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 03:06:16PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 09:35 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * blk-mq's SCHED_RESTART can cover this requeue, so
> > + * we needn't to deal with it by DELAY_REQUEUE. More
> > + * importantly, we have to return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE
> > + * so that blk-mq can get the queue busy feedback,
> > + * otherwise I/O merge can be hurt.
> > + */
> > + if (q->mq_ops)
> > + return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE;
> > + else
> > + return DM_MAPIO_DELAY_REQUEUE;
> > }
>
> This patch is inferior to what I posted because this patch does not avoid
> the delay if multiple LUNs are associated with the same SCSI host. Consider
> e.g. the following configuration:
> * A single SCSI host with two SCSI LUNs associated to that host, e.g. /dev/sda
> and /dev/sdb.
> * A dm-mpath instance has been created on top of /dev/sda.
> If all tags are in use by requests queued to /dev/sdb, no dm requests are in
> progress and a request is submitted against the dm-mpath device then the
> blk_get_request(q, GFP_ATOMIC) call will fail. The request will be requeued
> and the queue will be rerun after a delay.
>
> My patch does not introduce a delay in this case.
That delay may not matter because SCHED_RESTART will run queue just
after one request is completed.
There is at least one issue with get_request(GFP_NOIO): AIO
performance regression may not be caused, or even AIO may not
be possible. For example, user runs fio(libaio, randread, single
job, queue depth: 64, device: dm-mpath disk), if get_request(GFP_NOIO)
often blocks because of shared tags or out of tag, the actual queue
depth won't reach 64 at all, and may be just 1 in the worst case.
Once the actual queue depth is decreased much, random I/O performance
should be hurt a lot.
--
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-22 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-22 1:35 [PATCH] dm-mpath: return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE in case of rq allocation failure Ming Lei
2017-09-22 15:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-22 17:44 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-09-22 17:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-25 3:06 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-25 15:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-09-25 16:10 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-25 16:17 ` Mike Snitzer
2017-09-26 8:50 ` Ming Lei
2017-09-26 13:55 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170922174431.GA21108@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox