From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 06:45:04 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
        Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>,
        Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 4/6] block: prepare for passing RQF_PREEMPT to request
 allocation
Message-ID: <20171002134504.GD19119@infradead.org>
References: <20170930061214.10622-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
 <20170930061214.10622-5-ming.lei@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20170930061214.10622-5-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>

As mentioned in the reply to Bart, I'd much rather use BLK_MQ_REQ_*
for the sane blk_get_request version (which should have the same
prototype as blk_mq_alloc_request) instead of having another flags
namespace.