From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 12:31:05 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: Ming Lei Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Martin K . Petersen" , "James E . J . Bottomley" , Bart Van Assche , Oleksandr Natalenko , Johannes Thumshirn , Cathy Avery , Martin Steigerwald , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke , Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 5/8] percpu-refcount: introduce __percpu_ref_tryget_live Message-ID: <20171003193105.GL3301751@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> References: <20171003140406.26060-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20171003140406.26060-6-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20171003141459.GI3301751@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <20171003192039.GB5362@ming.t460p> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20171003192039.GB5362@ming.t460p> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 03:20:40AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 07:14:59AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 10:04:03PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > > Block layer need to call this function after holding > > > rcu lock in a real hot path, so introduce this helper. > > > > The patch description is too anemic. It doesn't even describe what > > changes are being made, let alone justifying them. > > Sorry for Cc you, and this change is needed by the following > patch: > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=150703956929333&w=2 > > Block layer need to call percpu_ref_tryget_live() > with holding RCU read lock, given it is a hot I/O > path, that is why I make this patch so that we can > avoid nested RCU read lock and save a bit cost. I'm not necessarily against it but please name it sth like percpu_ref_tryget_live_locked(), add lockdep assertions in the inner function and document properly. Thanks. -- tejun