From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, shli@kernel.org, Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] md: raid1 nowait support
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 08:55:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171004135511.26110-4-rgoldwyn@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171004135511.26110-1-rgoldwyn@suse.de>
From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
The RAID1 driver would bail with EAGAIN in case of:
+ I/O has to wait for a barrier
+ array is frozen
+ Area is suspended
+ There are too many pending I/O that it will be queued.
To facilitate error for wait barriers, wait_barrier() is
returning bool. True in case if there was a wait (or is not
required). False in case a wait was required, but was not performed.
Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
---
drivers/md/raid1.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
index f3f3e40dc9d8..37ec283e67af 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
@@ -891,8 +891,9 @@ static void lower_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
}
-static void _wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, int idx)
+static bool _wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, int idx, bool nowait)
{
+ bool ret = true;
/*
* We need to increase conf->nr_pending[idx] very early here,
* then raise_barrier() can be blocked when it waits for
@@ -923,7 +924,7 @@ static void _wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, int idx)
*/
if (!READ_ONCE(conf->array_frozen) &&
!atomic_read(&conf->barrier[idx]))
- return;
+ return ret;
/*
* After holding conf->resync_lock, conf->nr_pending[idx]
@@ -941,18 +942,29 @@ static void _wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, int idx)
*/
wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
/* Wait for the barrier in same barrier unit bucket to drop. */
- wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier,
- !conf->array_frozen &&
- !atomic_read(&conf->barrier[idx]),
- conf->resync_lock);
+ if (conf->array_frozen || atomic_read(&conf->barrier[idx])) {
+ if (nowait) {
+ ret = false;
+ goto dec_waiting;
+ } else {
+ wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier,
+ !conf->array_frozen &&
+ !atomic_read(&conf->barrier[idx]),
+ conf->resync_lock);
+ }
+ }
atomic_inc(&conf->nr_pending[idx]);
+dec_waiting:
atomic_dec(&conf->nr_waiting[idx]);
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
+ return ret;
}
-static void wait_read_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
+static bool wait_read_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr,
+ bool nowait)
{
int idx = sector_to_idx(sector_nr);
+ bool ret = true;
/*
* Very similar to _wait_barrier(). The difference is, for read
@@ -964,7 +976,7 @@ static void wait_read_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
atomic_inc(&conf->nr_pending[idx]);
if (!READ_ONCE(conf->array_frozen))
- return;
+ return ret;
spin_lock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
atomic_inc(&conf->nr_waiting[idx]);
@@ -975,19 +987,31 @@ static void wait_read_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
*/
wake_up(&conf->wait_barrier);
/* Wait for array to be unfrozen */
- wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier,
- !conf->array_frozen,
- conf->resync_lock);
+ if (conf->array_frozen) {
+ /* If nowait flag is set, return false to
+ * show we did not wait
+ */
+ if (nowait) {
+ ret = false;
+ goto dec_waiting;
+ } else {
+ wait_event_lock_irq(conf->wait_barrier,
+ !conf->array_frozen,
+ conf->resync_lock);
+ }
+ }
atomic_inc(&conf->nr_pending[idx]);
+dec_waiting:
atomic_dec(&conf->nr_waiting[idx]);
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->resync_lock);
+ return ret;
}
-static void wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr)
+static bool wait_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, sector_t sector_nr, bool nowait)
{
int idx = sector_to_idx(sector_nr);
- _wait_barrier(conf, idx);
+ return _wait_barrier(conf, idx, nowait);
}
static void wait_all_barriers(struct r1conf *conf)
@@ -995,7 +1019,7 @@ static void wait_all_barriers(struct r1conf *conf)
int idx;
for (idx = 0; idx < BARRIER_BUCKETS_NR; idx++)
- _wait_barrier(conf, idx);
+ _wait_barrier(conf, idx, false);
}
static void _allow_barrier(struct r1conf *conf, int idx)
@@ -1212,7 +1236,11 @@ static void raid1_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
* Still need barrier for READ in case that whole
* array is frozen.
*/
- wait_read_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
+ if (!wait_read_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
+ bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT)) {
+ bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
+ return;
+ }
if (!r1_bio)
r1_bio = alloc_r1bio(mddev, bio);
@@ -1321,6 +1349,11 @@ static void raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
* an interruptible wait.
*/
DEFINE_WAIT(w);
+ if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
+ bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
+ return;
+ }
+
for (;;) {
sigset_t full, old;
prepare_to_wait(&conf->wait_barrier,
@@ -1339,17 +1372,26 @@ static void raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
}
finish_wait(&conf->wait_barrier, &w);
}
- wait_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
-
- r1_bio = alloc_r1bio(mddev, bio);
- r1_bio->sectors = max_write_sectors;
+ if (!wait_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
+ bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT)) {
+ bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
+ return;
+ }
if (conf->pending_count >= max_queued_requests) {
md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
+ if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
+ bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
+ return;
+ }
raid1_log(mddev, "wait queued");
wait_event(conf->wait_barrier,
conf->pending_count < max_queued_requests);
}
+
+ r1_bio = alloc_r1bio(mddev, bio);
+ r1_bio->sectors = max_write_sectors;
+
/* first select target devices under rcu_lock and
* inc refcount on their rdev. Record them by setting
* bios[x] to bio
@@ -1435,9 +1477,15 @@ static void raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
rdev_dec_pending(conf->mirrors[j].rdev, mddev);
r1_bio->state = 0;
allow_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
+
+ if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
+ bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
+ free_r1bio(r1_bio);
+ return;
+ }
raid1_log(mddev, "wait rdev %d blocked", blocked_rdev->raid_disk);
md_wait_for_blocked_rdev(blocked_rdev, mddev);
- wait_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
+ wait_barrier(conf, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector, false);
goto retry_write;
}
--
2.14.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-04 13:55 [PATCH v2 0/9] Nowait support for stacked block devices Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-10-04 13:55 ` [PATCH 1/9] QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT to indicate device supports nowait Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-10-04 13:55 ` [PATCH 2/9] md: Add nowait support to md Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-10-04 13:55 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues [this message]
2017-10-04 13:55 ` [PATCH 4/9] md: raid10 nowait support Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-10-04 13:55 ` [PATCH 5/9] md: raid5 " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-10-04 13:55 ` [PATCH 6/9] dm: add " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-10-04 13:55 ` [PATCH 7/9] dm: Add nowait support to raid1 Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-10-04 13:55 ` [PATCH 8/9] dm: Add nowait support to dm-delay Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-10-04 13:55 ` [PATCH 9/9] dm-mpath: Add nowait support Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-10-05 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Nowait support for stacked block devices Shaohua Li
2017-10-06 12:01 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-10-10 22:36 ` Shaohua Li
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-07-26 23:57 [PATCH 0/9] Nowait feature " Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-07-26 23:58 ` [PATCH 3/9] md: raid1 nowait support Goldwyn Rodrigues
2017-08-08 20:39 ` Shaohua Li
2017-08-09 11:45 ` Goldwyn Rodrigues
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171004135511.26110-4-rgoldwyn@suse.de \
--to=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox