From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
Tom Nguyen <tom81094@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V9 1/7] blk-mq-sched: dispatch from scheduler only after progress is made on ->dispatch
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 02:05:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171013180532.29304-2-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171013180532.29304-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
When hw queue is busy, we shouldn't take requests from
scheduler queue any more, otherwise it is difficult to do
IO merge.
This patch fixes the awful IO performance on some
SCSI devices(lpfc, qla2xxx, ...) when mq-deadline/kyber
is used by not taking requests if hw queue is busy.
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-mq-sched.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
index 4ab69435708c..eca011fdfa0e 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
const bool has_sched_dispatch = e && e->type->ops.mq.dispatch_request;
- bool did_work = false;
+ bool do_sched_dispatch = true;
LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
/* RCU or SRCU read lock is needed before checking quiesced flag */
@@ -125,18 +125,18 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
*/
if (!list_empty(&rq_list)) {
blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(hctx);
- did_work = blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list);
+ do_sched_dispatch = blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list);
} else if (!has_sched_dispatch) {
blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(hctx, &rq_list);
blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list);
}
/*
- * We want to dispatch from the scheduler if we had no work left
- * on the dispatch list, OR if we did have work but weren't able
- * to make progress.
+ * We want to dispatch from the scheduler if there was nothing
+ * on the dispatch list or we were able to dispatch from the
+ * dispatch list.
*/
- if (!did_work && has_sched_dispatch) {
+ if (do_sched_dispatch && has_sched_dispatch) {
do {
struct request *rq;
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-13 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-13 18:05 [PATCH V9 0/7] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance Ming Lei
2017-10-13 18:05 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-10-13 18:05 ` [PATCH V9 2/7] blk-mq-sched: move actual dispatching into one helper Ming Lei
2017-10-13 18:05 ` [PATCH V9 3/7] sbitmap: introduce __sbitmap_for_each_set() Ming Lei
2017-10-13 18:05 ` [PATCH V9 4/7] blk-mq: introduce .get_budget and .put_budget in blk_mq_ops Ming Lei
2017-10-13 23:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-14 7:34 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 18:05 ` [PATCH V9 5/7] blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue Ming Lei
2017-10-13 18:05 ` [PATCH V9 6/7] SCSI: allow to pass null rq to scsi_prep_state_check() Ming Lei
2017-10-13 23:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-14 8:06 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-13 18:05 ` [PATCH V9 7/7] SCSI: implement .get_budget and .put_budget for blk-mq Ming Lei
2017-10-13 19:08 ` [PATCH V9 0/7] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance Jens Axboe
2017-10-13 19:21 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-13 20:23 ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-14 5:23 ` Ming Lei
2017-10-14 7:10 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171013180532.29304-2-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=tom81094@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).