public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
	"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hare@suse.com" <hare@suse.com>,
	"osandov@fb.com" <osandov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] dm-mpath: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 10:01:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171201020058.GA30132@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1511802882.2993.4.camel@wdc.com>

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 05:14:46PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 13:07 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > If .queue_rq() returns BLK_STS_RESOURCE, blk-mq will rerun the queue in
> > the three situations:
> > 
> > 1) if BLK_MQ_S_SCHED_RESTART is set
> > - queue is rerun after one rq is completed, see blk_mq_sched_restart()
> > which is run from blk_mq_free_request()
> > 
> > 2) run out of driver tag
> > - queue is rerun after one tag is freed
> > 
> > 3) otherwise
> > - queue is run immediately in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list()
> > 
> > This random dealy of running hw queue is introduced by commit 6077c2d706097c0
> > (dm rq: Avoid that request processing stalls sporadically), which claimed
> > one request processing stalling is fixed, but never explained the behind
> > idea, and it is a workaound at most. Even the question isn't explained by
> > anyone in recent discussion.
> > 
> > Also calling blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() inside .queue_rq() is a horrible
> > hack because it makes BLK_MQ_S_SCHED_RESTART not working, and degrades I/O
> > peformance a lot.
> > 
> > Finally this patch makes sure that dm-rq returns BLK_STS_RESOURCE to blk-mq
> > only when underlying queue is out of resource, so we switch to return
> > DM_MAPIO_DELAY_REQUEU if either MPATHF_QUEUE_IO or MPATHF_PG_INIT_REQUIRED
> > is set in multipath_clone_and_map().
> 
> Sorry but in my opinion the above description shows that you don't understand
> the dm-mpath driver completely.

I have to treat your above comment as a noop since you never provide a explanation.

Also I don't think it is wrong to deal with MPATHF_QUEUE_IO/MPATHF_PG_INIT_REQUIRED
via DM_MAPIO_DELAY_REQUEUE, since both can seldom happen, and the delay
won't cause performance issue.

The idea behind this change is that this patchset switches to return BLK_STS_RESOURCE
to blk-mq only when we run out of resource, but the above two(MPATHF_QUEUE_IO and
MPATHF_PG_INIT_REQUIRED) don't belong to 'run out of resource'.

> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > index c8faa2b85842..8fe3f45407ce 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > @@ -484,9 +484,7 @@ static int multipath_clone_and_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct request *rq,
> >  		return DM_MAPIO_KILL;
> >  	} else if (test_bit(MPATHF_QUEUE_IO, &m->flags) ||
> >  		   test_bit(MPATHF_PG_INIT_REQUIRED, &m->flags)) {
> > -		if (pg_init_all_paths(m))
> > -			return DM_MAPIO_DELAY_REQUEUE;
> > -		return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE;
> > +		return DM_MAPIO_DELAY_REQUEUE;
> >  	}
> 
> This patch removes a pg_init_all_paths() call but you don't explain why you
> think it is allowed to remove that call. Did you perhaps remove that call by
> mistake?

OK, that is a problem, will fix it in V2.

-- 
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-01  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-27  5:07 [PATCH V2 0/5] dm-rq: improve sequential I/O performance Ming Lei
2017-11-27  5:07 ` [PATCH V2 1/5] dm-mpath: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE Ming Lei
2017-11-27 17:14   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-12-01  2:01     ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-11-27  5:07 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] dm-mpath: return DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE in case of rq allocation failure Ming Lei
2017-11-27  5:07 ` [PATCH V2 3/5] blk-mq: move actual issue into one helper Ming Lei
2017-11-27  5:07 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] blk-mq: return dispatch result to caller in blk_mq_try_issue_directly Ming Lei
2017-11-27  5:07 ` [PATCH V2 5/5] blk-mq: issue request directly for blk_insert_cloned_request Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171201020058.GA30132@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox