From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 3/6] blk-mq: quiesce queue during switching io sched and updating nr_requests
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:31:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171214023103.18272-4-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171214023103.18272-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
Dispatch may still be in-progress after queue is frozen, so we have to
quiesce queue before switching IO scheduler and updating nr_requests.
Also when switching io schedulers, blk_mq_run_hw_queue() may still be
called somewhere(such as from nvme_reset_work()), and io scheduler's
per-hctx data may not be setup yet, so cause oops even inside
blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(), such as it can be run just between:
ret = e->ops.mq.init_sched(q, e);
AND
ret = e->ops.mq.init_hctx(hctx, i)
inside blk_mq_init_sched().
This reverts commit 7a148c2fcff8330(block: don't call blk_mq_quiesce_queue()
after queue is frozen) basically, and makes sure blk_mq_hctx_has_pending
won't be called if queue is quiesced.
Fixes: 7a148c2fcff83309(block: don't call blk_mq_quiesce_queue() after queue is frozen)
Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
block/elevator.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 5d69c8075339..85954a0b4394 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1296,7 +1296,30 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue);
bool blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
{
- if (blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx)) {
+ int srcu_idx;
+ bool need_run;
+
+ /*
+ * When queue is quiesced, we may be switching io scheduler, or
+ * updating nr_hw_queues, or other things, and we can't run queue
+ * any more, even __blk_mq_hctx_has_pending() can't be called safely.
+ *
+ * And queue will be rerun in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() if it is
+ * quiesced.
+ */
+ if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) &&
+ blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ } else {
+ srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(hctx->queue_rq_srcu);
+ need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) &&
+ blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx);
+ srcu_read_unlock(hctx->queue_rq_srcu, srcu_idx);
+ }
+
+ if (need_run) {
__blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, async, 0);
return true;
}
@@ -2721,6 +2744,7 @@ int blk_mq_update_nr_requests(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int nr)
return -EINVAL;
blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
+ blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
ret = 0;
queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
@@ -2744,6 +2768,7 @@ int blk_mq_update_nr_requests(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int nr)
if (!ret)
q->nr_requests = nr;
+ blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(q);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
return ret;
diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
index 7bda083d5968..138faeb08a7c 100644
--- a/block/elevator.c
+++ b/block/elevator.c
@@ -968,6 +968,7 @@ static int elevator_switch_mq(struct request_queue *q,
int ret;
blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
+ blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
if (q->elevator) {
if (q->elevator->registered)
@@ -994,6 +995,7 @@ static int elevator_switch_mq(struct request_queue *q,
blk_add_trace_msg(q, "elv switch: none");
out:
+ blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(q);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
return ret;
}
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-14 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-14 2:30 [PATCH V2 0/6] blk-mq: fix race related with device deletion/reset/switching sched Ming Lei
2017-12-14 2:30 ` [PATCH V2 1/6] blk-mq: quiesce queue before freeing queue Ming Lei
2017-12-29 9:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-12-14 2:30 ` [PATCH V2 2/6] blk-mq: support concurrent blk_mq_quiesce_queue() Ming Lei
2017-12-29 9:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-02 3:01 ` Ming Lei
2017-12-14 2:31 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-12-29 9:58 ` [PATCH V2 3/6] blk-mq: quiesce queue during switching io sched and updating nr_requests Christoph Hellwig
2017-12-14 2:31 ` [PATCH V2 4/6] blk-mq: avoid to map CPU into stale hw queue Ming Lei
2017-12-29 9:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-12-14 2:31 ` [PATCH V2 5/6] blk-mq: fix race between updating nr_hw_queues and switching io sched Ming Lei
2017-12-29 9:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-12-14 2:31 ` [PATCH V2 6/6] nvme-pci: remove .init_request callback Ming Lei
2017-12-21 8:20 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-12-21 8:36 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-12-22 1:34 ` Ming Lei
2017-12-24 8:50 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-12-19 15:30 ` [PATCH V2 0/6] blk-mq: fix race related with device deletion/reset/switching sched Yi Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171214023103.18272-4-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).