linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
To: weiping zhang <zwp10758@gmail.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	regressions@leemhuis.info, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression with a0747a859ef6 ("bdi: add error handle for bdi_debug_register")
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:30:48 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171215163048.GA15928@wolff.to> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA70yB66ekUGAvusQbqo7BLV+uBJtNz72cr+tZitsfjuVRWuXA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 22:02:20 +0800,
  weiping zhang <zwp10758@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Yes, please help reproduce this issue include my debug patch. Reproduce means
>we can see WARN_ON in device_add_disk caused by failure of bdi_register_owner.

I'm not sure why yet, but I'm only getting the warning message you want 
with Fedora kernels, not the ones I am building (with or without your test 
patch). I'll attach a debug config file if you want to look there. But in 
theory that should be essentially what Fedora is using for theirs. They 
probably have some out of tree patches they are applying, but I wouldn't 
expect those to make a difference here. I think they now have a tree 
somewhere that I can try to build from that has their patches applied 
to the upstream kernel and if I can find it I will try building it just 
to test this out.

I only have about 6 hours of physical access to the machine exhibiting 
the problem, and after that I won't be able to do test boots until Monday.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-15 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-14  0:54 Regression with a0747a859ef6 ("bdi: add error handle for bdi_debug_register") Laura Abbott
2017-12-14  8:24 ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-14 10:09   ` weiping zhang
2017-12-14 10:29     ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-14 15:41     ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-15  1:22       ` weiping zhang
2017-12-15  1:44         ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-15  2:04           ` weiping zhang
2017-12-15  2:11             ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-15 11:10             ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-15 14:02               ` weiping zhang
2017-12-15 16:30                 ` Bruno Wolff III [this message]
2017-12-15 17:18                   ` Laura Abbott
2017-12-15 17:40                     ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-15 19:51                 ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-16 16:32                   ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-17 13:43                     ` weiping zhang
2017-12-17 15:54                       ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-18 21:53                       ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-19 16:17                       ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-19 18:24                         ` Shaohua Li
2017-12-19 19:48                           ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-20  0:20                           ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-21 13:00 ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-21 14:01   ` weiping zhang
2017-12-21 15:18     ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-21 15:31       ` weiping zhang
2017-12-21 15:36         ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-21 15:48           ` weiping zhang
2017-12-21 16:42             ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-21 17:02               ` Jens Axboe
2017-12-21 17:46                 ` weiping zhang
2017-12-21 18:15                 ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-21 23:16                   ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-22  4:53                     ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-22 13:20                       ` weiping zhang
2017-12-22 14:04                         ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-29 16:30                           ` weiping zhang
2017-12-29 18:44                             ` Bruno Wolff III
2017-12-29 16:36                           ` weiping zhang
2017-12-22  0:29                 ` James Bottomley
2017-12-22  1:29                   ` weiping zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171215163048.GA15928@wolff.to \
    --to=bruno@wolff.to \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=zwp10758@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).