From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux NVMe <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
Device Mapper <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Bart VanAssche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Failover criteria unification
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 16:47:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180104234727.GA15654@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180104233627.GA16051@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 06:36:27PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Right, I dropped that patch since it'd have only resulted in conflicts
> come merge time. As such, this series can easily go through the nvme
> tree to Jens.
It looks like you can also touch up dm to allow it to multipath nvme
even if CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH is set. It may be useful since native NVMe
doesn't multipath namespaces across subsystems, and some crack smoking
people want to create something that requires that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-04 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-04 22:46 [PATCH 0/5] Failover criteria unification Keith Busch
2018-01-04 22:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] nvme: Add more command status translation Keith Busch
2018-01-04 23:41 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-08 8:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-08 9:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-08 10:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-08 10:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-08 15:29 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-08 15:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-08 16:12 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-04 22:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvme/multipath: Consult blk_status_t for failover Keith Busch
2018-01-04 23:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-08 8:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-08 9:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-09 17:38 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-09 17:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-04 22:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] block: Provide blk_status_t decoding for retryable errors Keith Busch
2018-01-04 23:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-08 8:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-08 9:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-04 22:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme/multipath: Use blk_retryable Keith Busch
2018-01-04 23:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-08 8:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-04 22:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] dm mpath: " Keith Busch
2018-01-04 23:45 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-08 8:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-04 23:36 ` [PATCH 0/5] Failover criteria unification Mike Snitzer
2018-01-04 23:47 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-01-05 0:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-08 9:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180104234727.GA15654@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).