linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
	Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 2/4] blk-mq: quiesce queue during switching io sched and updating nr_requests
Date: Sat,  6 Jan 2018 16:27:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180106082740.26442-3-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180106082740.26442-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

Dispatch may still be in-progress after queue is frozen, so we have to
quiesce queue before switching IO scheduler and updating nr_requests.

Also when switching io schedulers, blk_mq_run_hw_queue() may still be
called somewhere(such as from nvme_reset_work()), and io scheduler's
per-hctx data may not be setup yet, so cause oops even inside
blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(), such as it can be run just between:

        ret = e->ops.mq.init_sched(q, e);
AND
        ret = e->ops.mq.init_hctx(hctx, i)

inside blk_mq_init_sched().

This reverts commit 7a148c2fcff8330(block: don't call blk_mq_quiesce_queue()
after queue is frozen) basically, and makes sure blk_mq_hctx_has_pending
won't be called if queue is quiesced.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Fixes: 7a148c2fcff83309(block: don't call blk_mq_quiesce_queue() after queue is frozen)
Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c   | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 block/elevator.c |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 11097477eeab..1c66c319325c 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1285,7 +1285,30 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue);
 
 bool blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
 {
-	if (blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx)) {
+	int srcu_idx;
+	bool need_run;
+
+	/*
+	 * When queue is quiesced, we may be switching io scheduler, or
+	 * updating nr_hw_queues, or other things, and we can't run queue
+	 * any more, even __blk_mq_hctx_has_pending() can't be called safely.
+	 *
+	 * And queue will be rerun in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() if it is
+	 * quiesced.
+	 */
+	if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)) {
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) &&
+			blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+	} else {
+		srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(hctx->queue_rq_srcu);
+		need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) &&
+			blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx);
+		srcu_read_unlock(hctx->queue_rq_srcu, srcu_idx);
+	}
+
+	if (need_run) {
 		__blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, async, 0);
 		return true;
 	}
@@ -2710,6 +2733,7 @@ int blk_mq_update_nr_requests(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int nr)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
+	blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
 
 	ret = 0;
 	queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
@@ -2733,6 +2757,7 @@ int blk_mq_update_nr_requests(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int nr)
 	if (!ret)
 		q->nr_requests = nr;
 
+	blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(q);
 	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
 
 	return ret;
diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
index 7bda083d5968..138faeb08a7c 100644
--- a/block/elevator.c
+++ b/block/elevator.c
@@ -968,6 +968,7 @@ static int elevator_switch_mq(struct request_queue *q,
 	int ret;
 
 	blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
+	blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
 
 	if (q->elevator) {
 		if (q->elevator->registered)
@@ -994,6 +995,7 @@ static int elevator_switch_mq(struct request_queue *q,
 		blk_add_trace_msg(q, "elv switch: none");
 
 out:
+	blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(q);
 	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-06  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-06  8:27 [PATCH V3 0/4] blk-mq: fix race related with device deletion/reset/switching sched Ming Lei
2018-01-06  8:27 ` [PATCH V3 1/4] blk-mq: quiesce queue before freeing queue Ming Lei
2018-01-06  8:27 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-01-06  8:27 ` [PATCH V3 3/4] blk-mq: avoid to map CPU into stale hw queue Ming Lei
2018-01-06  8:27 ` [PATCH V3 4/4] blk-mq: fix race between updating nr_hw_queues and switching io sched Ming Lei
2018-01-06 16:26 ` [PATCH V3 0/4] blk-mq: fix race related with device deletion/reset/switching sched Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180106082740.26442-3-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).