From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52706 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932876AbeAIBWG (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 20:22:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:21:52 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Michael Lyle Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] block: move bio_alloc_pages() to bcache Message-ID: <20180109012151.GA31067@ming.t460p> References: <20171208131409.11889-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20171208131409.11889-9-ming.lei@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 10:05:09AM -0800, Michael Lyle wrote: > On 12/08/2017 05:14 AM, Ming Lei wrote: > > bcache is the only user of bio_alloc_pages(), and all users should use > > bio_add_page() instead, so move this function into bcache, and avoid > > it misused in future. > > Can things like this -please- be sent to the bcache list and bcache > maintainers? I'm preparing my patch set for Jens and I'm surprised by > merge conflicts from stuff in my queue. (Just showed up in next to show > the conflict in the past couple of days). OK, will do next time. -- Ming