From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "hare@suse.de" <hare@suse.de>, "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"tom.leiming@gmail.com" <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:29:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180111172943.GA30762@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515691112.2752.21.camel@wdc.com>
On Thu, Jan 11 2018 at 12:18pm -0500,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 12:04 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > So my v4, that I'll send out shortly, won't be using test_and_clear_bit()
>
> Please use queue_flag_set(), queue_flag_clear(), queue_flag_test_and_clear() and/or
> queue_flag_test_and_set() to manipulate queue flags.
Can you please expand on this? My patch is only using test_bit().
So your comment isn't relevant.
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-11 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-11 2:12 [for-4.16 PATCH v3 0/3] block/dm: allow DM to defer blk_register_queue() until ready Mike Snitzer
2018-01-11 2:12 ` [for-4.16 PATCH v3 1/3] block: only bdi_unregister() in del_gendisk() if !GENHD_FL_HIDDEN Mike Snitzer
2018-01-11 2:48 ` Ming Lei
2018-01-11 7:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-11 2:12 ` [for-4.16 PATCH v3 2/3] block: allow gendisk's request_queue registration to be deferred Mike Snitzer
2018-01-11 2:54 ` Ming Lei
2018-01-11 7:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-11 17:04 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-11 17:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-11 17:29 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2018-01-11 17:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-11 19:20 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-11 19:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-11 19:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-11 7:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-11 16:03 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-11 2:12 ` [for-4.16 PATCH v3 3/3] dm: fix awkward and incomplete request_queue initialization Mike Snitzer
2018-01-11 2:56 ` Ming Lei
2018-01-11 7:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180111172943.GA30762@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).