From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:06:36 -0500 From: Mike Snitzer To: Bart Van Assche Cc: "dm-devel@redhat.com" , "hch@infradead.org" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" , "axboe@fb.com" , "ming.lei@redhat.com" , "axboe@kernel.dk" Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/5] dm-rq: improve sequential I/O performance Message-ID: <20180112180635.GD5134@redhat.com> References: <20180111060159.12991-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20180111220742.GA31944@redhat.com> <1515710256.2752.72.camel@sandisk.com> <20180112014232.GB25090@ming.t460p> <20180112015721.GB32298@redhat.com> <20180112033308.GC25090@ming.t460p> <20180112171840.GA4541@redhat.com> <1515778013.2396.3.camel@wdc.com> <20180112174000.GB5134@redhat.com> <1515779211.2396.11.camel@wdc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1515779211.2396.11.camel@wdc.com> List-ID: On Fri, Jan 12 2018 at 12:46pm -0500, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 12:40 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > You've not explained it many times. > > That's not correct. I have already several times posted a detailed and easy > to understand explanation OK, you have the stage: please give me a pointer to your best explaination of the several. > > We cannot get a straight answer from you. > > That is a gross and incorrect statement. Please calm down. I'm perfectly calm. I'm just tired of how you sow controversy.