linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"osandov@fb.com" <osandov@fb.com>,
	"ming.lei@redhat.com" <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] blk-mq: fixup RESTART when queue becomes idle
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:23:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180118212327.GB31679@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1516309128.2676.38.camel@wdc.com>

On Thu, Jan 18 2018 at  3:58P -0500,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 15:48 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > For Bart's test the underlying scsi-mq driver is what is regularly
> > hitting this case in __blk_mq_try_issue_directly():
> > 
> >         if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx) || blk_queue_quiesced(q))
> 
> Hello Mike,
> 
> That code path is not the code path that triggered the lockups that I reported
> during the past days.

If you're hitting blk_mq_sched_insert_request() then you most certainly
are hitting that code path.

If you aren't then what was your earlier email going on about?
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2018-January/msg00372.html

If you were just focusing on that as one possible reason, that isn't
very helpful.  By this point you really should _know_ what is triggering
the stall based on the code paths taken.  Please use ftrace's
function_graph tracer if need be.

> These lockups were all triggered by incorrect handling of
> .queue_rq() returning BLK_STS_RESOURCE.

Please be precise, dm_mq_queue_rq()'s return of BLK_STS_RESOURCE?
"Incorrect" because it no longer runs blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue()?

Please try to do more work analyzing the test case that only you can
easily run (due to srp_test being a PITA).  And less time lobbying for
a change that you don't understand to _really_ be correct.

We have time to get this right, please stop hyperventilating about
"regressions".

Thanks,
Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-18 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-18  2:41 [RFC PATCH] blk-mq: fixup RESTART when queue becomes idle Ming Lei
2018-01-18 16:50 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-18 17:03   ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-18 17:20     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-18 18:30       ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-18 18:47         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-18 20:11           ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-18 20:48             ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-18 20:58               ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-18 21:23                 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2018-01-18 21:37                   ` Laurence Oberman
2018-01-18 21:39                   ` [dm-devel] " Bart Van Assche
2018-01-18 21:45                     ` Laurence Oberman
2018-01-18 22:01                     ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-18 22:18                       ` Laurence Oberman
2018-01-18 22:20                         ` Laurence Oberman
2018-01-18 22:24                         ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-18 22:35                           ` Laurence Oberman
2018-01-18 22:39                             ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-18 22:55                               ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-18 22:20                       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-23  9:22                         ` [PATCH] block: neutralize blk_insert_cloned_request IO stall regression (was: Re: [RFC PATCH] blk-mq: fixup RESTART when queue becomes idle) Mike Snitzer
2018-01-23 10:53                           ` Ming Lei
2018-01-23 12:15                             ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-23 12:17                               ` Ming Lei
2018-01-23 12:43                                 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-23 16:43                           ` [PATCH] " Bart Van Assche
2018-01-19  2:32             ` [RFC PATCH] blk-mq: fixup RESTART when queue becomes idle Ming Lei
2018-01-19  4:02               ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19  7:26                 ` Ming Lei
2018-01-19 15:20                   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-19 15:25                     ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19 15:33                     ` Ming Lei
2018-01-19 16:06                       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-19 15:24                   ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19 15:40                     ` Ming Lei
2018-01-19 15:48                       ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19 16:05                         ` Ming Lei
2018-01-19 16:19                           ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19 16:26                             ` Ming Lei
2018-01-19 16:27                               ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19 16:37                                 ` Ming Lei
2018-01-19 16:41                                   ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19 16:47                                     ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-19 16:52                                       ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19 17:05                                         ` Ming Lei
2018-01-19 17:09                                           ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19 17:20                                             ` Ming Lei
2018-01-19 17:38                                   ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19 18:24                                     ` Ming Lei
2018-01-19 18:33                                     ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-19 23:52                                     ` Ming Lei
2018-01-20  4:27                                       ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19 16:13                         ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-19 16:23                           ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19 23:57                             ` Ming Lei
2018-01-29 22:37                     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-19  5:09               ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-19  7:34                 ` Ming Lei
2018-01-19 19:47                   ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180118212327.GB31679@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).