public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm rq: Avoid that request processing stalls sporadically
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:11:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180119001136.GA4712@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180118163707.11825-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 08:37:07AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> If the .queue_rq() implementation of a block driver returns
> BLK_STS_RESOURCE then that block driver is responsible for
> rerunning the queue once the condition that caused it to return
> BLK_STS_RESOURCE has been cleared. The dm-mpath driver tells the
> dm core to requeue a request if e.g. not enough memory is
> available for cloning a request or if the underlying path is
> busy. Since the dm-mpath driver does not receive any kind of
> notification if the condition that caused it to return "requeue"
> is cleared, the only solution to avoid that dm-mpath request
> processing stalls is to call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(). Hence
> this patch.
> 
> Fixes: ec3eaf9a6731 ("dm mpath: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE")
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm-rq.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-rq.c b/drivers/md/dm-rq.c
> index f16096af879a..c59c59cfd2a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-rq.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-rq.c
> @@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ static blk_status_t dm_mq_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>  		/* Undo dm_start_request() before requeuing */
>  		rq_end_stats(md, rq);
>  		rq_completed(md, rq_data_dir(rq), false);
> +		blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, 100/*ms*/);
>  		return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
>  	}
>  

Nak.

It still takes a bit time to add this request to hctx->dispatch_list
from here, so suppose the time is longer than 100ms because of interrupt
, preemption or whatever, this request can't be observed in the scheduled
run queue(__blk_mq_run_hw_queue).

Not mention it is just a ugly workaround, which degrades performance
a lot.

-- 
Ming

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-19  0:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-18 16:37 [PATCH] dm rq: Avoid that request processing stalls sporadically Bart Van Assche
2018-01-18 16:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-01-18 17:13   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-19  0:26     ` Ming Lei
2018-01-19  0:33       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-19  0:11 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-01-19  0:14   ` [PATCH] " Bart Van Assche
2018-01-19  0:18     ` Ming Lei
2018-01-19  0:21       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-19  0:24       ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19  0:35         ` Ming Lei
2018-01-19  0:49           ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-19  6:36             ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180119001136.GA4712@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox