From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Fix a race between resetting the timer and completion handling
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 13:06:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180205210601.GP1121507@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180201224930.17918-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Hello, Bart.
Thanks a lot for testing and fixing the issues but I'm a bit confused
by the patch. Maybe we can split patch a bit more? There seem to be
three things going on,
1. Changing preemption protection to irq protection in issue path.
2. Merge of aborted_gstate_sync and gstate_seq.
3. Updates to blk_mq_rq_timed_out().
Are all three changes necessary for stability?
> @@ -831,13 +834,12 @@ static void blk_mq_rq_timed_out(struct request *req, bool reserved)
> __blk_mq_complete_request(req);
> break;
> case BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER:
> - /*
> - * As nothing prevents from completion happening while
> - * ->aborted_gstate is set, this may lead to ignored
> - * completions and further spurious timeouts.
> - */
> - blk_mq_rq_update_aborted_gstate(req, 0);
> + local_irq_disable();
> + write_seqcount_begin(&req->gstate_seq);
> blk_add_timer(req);
> + req->aborted_gstate = 0;
> + write_seqcount_end(&req->gstate_seq);
> + local_irq_enable();
> break;
So, this is #3 and I'm not sure how adding gstate_seq protection gets
rid of the race condition mentioned in the comment. It's still the
same that nothing is protecting against racing w/ completion.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-05 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-01 22:49 [PATCH] blk-mq: Fix a race between resetting the timer and completion handling Bart Van Assche
2018-02-05 21:06 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-02-05 21:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-05 21:37 ` tj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180205210601.GP1121507@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox