public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Fix a race between resetting the timer and completion handling
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 13:06:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180205210601.GP1121507@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180201224930.17918-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>

Hello, Bart.

Thanks a lot for testing and fixing the issues but I'm a bit confused
by the patch.  Maybe we can split patch a bit more?  There seem to be
three things going on,

1. Changing preemption protection to irq protection in issue path.

2. Merge of aborted_gstate_sync and gstate_seq.

3. Updates to blk_mq_rq_timed_out().

Are all three changes necessary for stability?

> @@ -831,13 +834,12 @@ static void blk_mq_rq_timed_out(struct request *req, bool reserved)
>  		__blk_mq_complete_request(req);
>  		break;
>  	case BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER:
> -		/*
> -		 * As nothing prevents from completion happening while
> -		 * ->aborted_gstate is set, this may lead to ignored
> -		 * completions and further spurious timeouts.
> -		 */
> -		blk_mq_rq_update_aborted_gstate(req, 0);
> +		local_irq_disable();
> +		write_seqcount_begin(&req->gstate_seq);
>  		blk_add_timer(req);
> +		req->aborted_gstate = 0;
> +		write_seqcount_end(&req->gstate_seq);
> +		local_irq_enable();
>  		break;

So, this is #3 and I'm not sure how adding gstate_seq protection gets
rid of the race condition mentioned in the comment.  It's still the
same that nothing is protecting against racing w/ completion.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-05 21:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-01 22:49 [PATCH] blk-mq: Fix a race between resetting the timer and completion handling Bart Van Assche
2018-02-05 21:06 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-02-05 21:33   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-02-05 21:37     ` tj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180205210601.GP1121507@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox