* [PATCH v2] block: Add should_fail_bio() for bpf error injection
@ 2018-02-06 21:11 Howard McLauchlan
2018-02-06 21:15 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Howard McLauchlan @ 2018-02-06 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-block
Cc: Jens Axboe, kernel-team, Omar Sandoval, Josef Bacik,
Howard McLauchlan
The classic error injection mechanism, should_fail_request() does not
support use cases where more information is required (from the entire
struct bio, for example).
To that end, this patch introduces should_fail_bio(), which calls
should_fail_request() under the hood but provides a convenient
place for kprobes to hook into if they require the entire struct bio.
This patch also replaces some existing calls to should_fail_request()
with should_fail_bio() with no degradation in performance.
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Howard McLauchlan <hmclauchlan@fb.com>
---
V2: rebased on master for 4.15
block/blk-core.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index d0d104268f1a..560a0260a8dc 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <linux/blk-cgroup.h>
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/block.h>
@@ -2083,6 +2084,12 @@ static inline bool bio_check_ro(struct bio *bio, struct hd_struct *part)
return false;
}
+static noinline bool should_fail_bio(struct bio *bio)
+{
+ return should_fail_request(&bio->bi_disk->part0, bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
+}
+BPF_ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(should_fail_bio);
+
/*
* Remap block n of partition p to block n+start(p) of the disk.
*/
@@ -2174,7 +2181,7 @@ generic_make_request_checks(struct bio *bio)
if ((bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) && !queue_is_rq_based(q))
goto not_supported;
- if (should_fail_request(&bio->bi_disk->part0, bio->bi_iter.bi_size))
+ if (should_fail_bio(bio))
goto end_io;
if (!bio->bi_partno) {
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] block: Add should_fail_bio() for bpf error injection
2018-02-06 21:11 [PATCH v2] block: Add should_fail_bio() for bpf error injection Howard McLauchlan
@ 2018-02-06 21:15 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2018-02-06 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Howard McLauchlan, linux-block; +Cc: kernel-team, Omar Sandoval, Josef Bacik
On 2/6/18 2:11 PM, Howard McLauchlan wrote:
> The classic error injection mechanism, should_fail_request() does not
> support use cases where more information is required (from the entire
> struct bio, for example).
>
> To that end, this patch introduces should_fail_bio(), which calls
> should_fail_request() under the hood but provides a convenient
> place for kprobes to hook into if they require the entire struct bio.
> This patch also replaces some existing calls to should_fail_request()
> with should_fail_bio() with no degradation in performance.
It fails:
block/blk-core.c:2091:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
BPF_ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(should_fail_bio);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
block/blk-core.c:2091:1: error: type defaults to ‘int’ in declaration of ‘BPF_ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION’ [-Werror=implicit-int]
block/blk-core.c:2091:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-06 21:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-06 21:11 [PATCH v2] block: Add should_fail_bio() for bpf error injection Howard McLauchlan
2018-02-06 21:15 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox