Re: [PATCH V2 2/8] blk-mq: introduce BLK_MQ_F_GLOBAL_TAGS

Bart Van Assche
2018-02-07T16:09:21Z

On 02/06/18 15:18, Jens Axboe wrote:
> GLOBAL implies that it's, strangely enough, global. That isn't really the
> case. Why not call this BLK_MQ_F_HOST_TAGS or something like that? I'd
> welcome better names, but global doesn't seem to be a great choice.
>
> BLK_MQ_F_SET_TAGS?

I like the name BLK_MQ_F_HOST_TAGS because it refers how these tags will
be used by SCSI LLDs, namely as a host-wide tag set.

Thanks,

Bart.