From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: xuejiufei <jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Caspar Zhang <caspar@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-throttle: fix race between blkcg_bio_issue_check and cgroup_rmdir
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:33:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180227183355.GG24003@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac3f48fc-e306-5df3-1c30-cd3b385d971f@linux.alibaba.com>
Hello, Joseph.
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 09:45:49AM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> > IIRC, as long as the blkcg and the device are there, the blkgs aren't
> > gonna be destroyed. So, if you have a ref to the blkcg through
> > tryget, the blkg shouldn't go away.
> >
>
> Maybe we have misunderstanding here.
>
> In this case, blkg doesn't go away as we have rcu protect, but
> blkg_destroy() can be called, in which blkg_put() will put the last
> refcnt and then schedule __blkg_release_rcu().
>
> css refcnt can't prevent blkcg css from offlining, instead it is css
> online_cnt.
>
> css_tryget() will only get a refcnt of blkcg css, but can't be
> guaranteed to fail when css is confirmed to kill.
Ah, you're right. I was thinking we only destroy blkgs from blkcg
release path. Given that we primarily use blkcg refcnting to pin
them, I believe that's what we should do - ie. only call
pd_offline_fn() from blkcg_css_offline() path and do the rest of
destruction from blkcg_css_free(). What do you think?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-27 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-07 8:40 [PATCH v2] blk-throttle: fix race between blkcg_bio_issue_check and cgroup_rmdir Joseph Qi
2018-02-07 21:38 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-08 2:29 ` Joseph Qi
2018-02-08 15:23 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-09 2:15 ` Joseph Qi
2018-02-12 17:11 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-22 6:14 ` Joseph Qi
2018-02-22 15:18 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-23 1:56 ` xuejiufei
2018-02-23 14:23 ` Tejun Heo
2018-02-24 1:45 ` Joseph Qi
2018-02-27 3:18 ` Joseph Qi
2018-02-27 18:33 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-02-28 6:52 ` Joseph Qi
2018-03-04 20:23 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-05 1:17 ` Joseph Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180227183355.GG24003@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=caspar@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox