From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: avoid to write intermediate result to hctx->next_cpu
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 17:48:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180408094814.28953-4-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180408094814.28953-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
This patch figures out the final selected CPU, then writes
it to hctx->next_cpu once, then we can avoid to intermediate
next cpu observed from other dispatch paths.
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 17 +++++++++--------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 9b220dc415ac..a16efa6f2e7f 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1345,26 +1345,24 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
bool tried = false;
+ int next_cpu = hctx->next_cpu;
if (hctx->queue->nr_hw_queues == 1)
return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
if (--hctx->next_cpu_batch <= 0) {
- int next_cpu;
select_cpu:
- next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(hctx->next_cpu, hctx->cpumask,
+ next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(next_cpu, hctx->cpumask,
cpu_online_mask);
if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
- next_cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask,cpu_online_mask);
+ next_cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
/*
* No online CPU is found, so have to make sure hctx->next_cpu
* is set correctly for not breaking workqueue.
*/
if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
- hctx->next_cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
- else
- hctx->next_cpu = next_cpu;
+ next_cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
hctx->next_cpu_batch = BLK_MQ_CPU_WORK_BATCH;
}
@@ -1372,7 +1370,7 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
* Do unbound schedule if we can't find a online CPU for this hctx,
* and it should only happen in the path of handling CPU DEAD.
*/
- if (!cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu)) {
+ if (!cpu_online(next_cpu)) {
if (!tried) {
tried = true;
goto select_cpu;
@@ -1382,10 +1380,13 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
* Make sure to re-select CPU next time once after CPUs
* in hctx->cpumask become online again.
*/
+ hctx->next_cpu = next_cpu;
hctx->next_cpu_batch = 1;
return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
}
- return hctx->next_cpu;
+
+ hctx->next_cpu = next_cpu;
+ return next_cpu;
}
static void __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async,
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-08 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-08 9:48 [PATCH 0/8] blk-mq: fix and improve queue mapping Ming Lei
2018-04-08 9:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] blk-mq: make sure that correct hctx->next_cpu is set Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08 9:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] blk-mq: don't keep offline CPUs mapped to hctx 0 Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08 9:48 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-04-09 10:05 ` [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: avoid to write intermediate result to hctx->next_cpu Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08 9:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_hw_queue_first_cpu() to figure out first cpu Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08 9:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] blk-mq: remove blk_mq_delay_queue() Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08 9:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] blk-mq: don't check queue mapped in __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08 9:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: reimplement blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08 9:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: remove code for dealing with remapping queue Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-09 10:13 ` [PATCH 0/8] blk-mq: fix and improve queue mapping Christian Borntraeger
2018-04-09 15:00 ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-09 15:48 ` Stefan Haberland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180408094814.28953-4-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).