linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: avoid to write intermediate result to hctx->next_cpu
Date: Sun,  8 Apr 2018 17:48:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180408094814.28953-4-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180408094814.28953-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

This patch figures out the final selected CPU, then writes
it to hctx->next_cpu once, then we can avoid to intermediate
next cpu observed from other dispatch paths.

Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 9b220dc415ac..a16efa6f2e7f 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1345,26 +1345,24 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
 	bool tried = false;
+	int next_cpu = hctx->next_cpu;
 
 	if (hctx->queue->nr_hw_queues == 1)
 		return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
 
 	if (--hctx->next_cpu_batch <= 0) {
-		int next_cpu;
 select_cpu:
-		next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(hctx->next_cpu, hctx->cpumask,
+		next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(next_cpu, hctx->cpumask,
 				cpu_online_mask);
 		if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-			next_cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask,cpu_online_mask);
+			next_cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
 
 		/*
 		 * No online CPU is found, so have to make sure hctx->next_cpu
 		 * is set correctly for not breaking workqueue.
 		 */
 		if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-			hctx->next_cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
-		else
-			hctx->next_cpu = next_cpu;
+			next_cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
 		hctx->next_cpu_batch = BLK_MQ_CPU_WORK_BATCH;
 	}
 
@@ -1372,7 +1370,7 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 	 * Do unbound schedule if we can't find a online CPU for this hctx,
 	 * and it should only happen in the path of handling CPU DEAD.
 	 */
-	if (!cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu)) {
+	if (!cpu_online(next_cpu)) {
 		if (!tried) {
 			tried = true;
 			goto select_cpu;
@@ -1382,10 +1380,13 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 		 * Make sure to re-select CPU next time once after CPUs
 		 * in hctx->cpumask become online again.
 		 */
+		hctx->next_cpu = next_cpu;
 		hctx->next_cpu_batch = 1;
 		return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
 	}
-	return hctx->next_cpu;
+
+	hctx->next_cpu = next_cpu;
+	return next_cpu;
 }
 
 static void __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async,
-- 
2.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-08  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-08  9:48 [PATCH 0/8] blk-mq: fix and improve queue mapping Ming Lei
2018-04-08  9:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] blk-mq: make sure that correct hctx->next_cpu is set Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08  9:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] blk-mq: don't keep offline CPUs mapped to hctx 0 Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08  9:48 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-04-09 10:05   ` [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: avoid to write intermediate result to hctx->next_cpu Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08  9:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_hw_queue_first_cpu() to figure out first cpu Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08  9:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] blk-mq: remove blk_mq_delay_queue() Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08  9:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] blk-mq: don't check queue mapped in __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08  9:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: reimplement blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08  9:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: remove code for dealing with remapping queue Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-09 10:13 ` [PATCH 0/8] blk-mq: fix and improve queue mapping Christian Borntraeger
2018-04-09 15:00 ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-09 15:48 ` Stefan Haberland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180408094814.28953-4-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).