From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_hw_queue_first_cpu() to figure out first cpu
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 17:48:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180408094814.28953-5-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180408094814.28953-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
This patch introduces helper of blk_mq_hw_queue_first_cpu() for
figuring out the hctx's first cpu, and code duplication can be
avoided.
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index a16efa6f2e7f..e3d02af79010 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1336,6 +1336,15 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
}
+static inline int blk_mq_first_mapped_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+{
+ int cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
+
+ if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+ cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
+ return cpu;
+}
+
/*
* It'd be great if the workqueue API had a way to pass
* in a mask and had some smarts for more clever placement.
@@ -1355,14 +1364,7 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(next_cpu, hctx->cpumask,
cpu_online_mask);
if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
- next_cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
-
- /*
- * No online CPU is found, so have to make sure hctx->next_cpu
- * is set correctly for not breaking workqueue.
- */
- if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
- next_cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
+ next_cpu = blk_mq_first_mapped_cpu(hctx);
hctx->next_cpu_batch = BLK_MQ_CPU_WORK_BATCH;
}
@@ -2431,10 +2433,7 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q)
/*
* Initialize batch roundrobin counts
*/
- hctx->next_cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask,
- cpu_online_mask);
- if (hctx->next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
- hctx->next_cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
+ hctx->next_cpu = blk_mq_first_mapped_cpu(hctx);
hctx->next_cpu_batch = BLK_MQ_CPU_WORK_BATCH;
}
}
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-08 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-08 9:48 [PATCH 0/8] blk-mq: fix and improve queue mapping Ming Lei
2018-04-08 9:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] blk-mq: make sure that correct hctx->next_cpu is set Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08 9:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] blk-mq: don't keep offline CPUs mapped to hctx 0 Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08 9:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: avoid to write intermediate result to hctx->next_cpu Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08 9:48 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-04-09 10:06 ` [PATCH 4/8] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_hw_queue_first_cpu() to figure out first cpu Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08 9:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] blk-mq: remove blk_mq_delay_queue() Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08 9:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] blk-mq: don't check queue mapped in __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08 9:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: reimplement blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08 9:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: remove code for dealing with remapping queue Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-09 10:13 ` [PATCH 0/8] blk-mq: fix and improve queue mapping Christian Borntraeger
2018-04-09 15:00 ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-09 15:48 ` Stefan Haberland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180408094814.28953-5-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).