linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_hw_queue_first_cpu() to figure out first cpu
Date: Sun,  8 Apr 2018 17:48:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180408094814.28953-5-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180408094814.28953-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

This patch introduces helper of blk_mq_hw_queue_first_cpu() for
figuring out the hctx's first cpu, and code duplication can be
avoided.

Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index a16efa6f2e7f..e3d02af79010 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1336,6 +1336,15 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 	hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
 }
 
+static inline int blk_mq_first_mapped_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+{
+	int cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
+
+	if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+		cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
+	return cpu;
+}
+
 /*
  * It'd be great if the workqueue API had a way to pass
  * in a mask and had some smarts for more clever placement.
@@ -1355,14 +1364,7 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 		next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(next_cpu, hctx->cpumask,
 				cpu_online_mask);
 		if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-			next_cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
-
-		/*
-		 * No online CPU is found, so have to make sure hctx->next_cpu
-		 * is set correctly for not breaking workqueue.
-		 */
-		if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-			next_cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
+			next_cpu = blk_mq_first_mapped_cpu(hctx);
 		hctx->next_cpu_batch = BLK_MQ_CPU_WORK_BATCH;
 	}
 
@@ -2431,10 +2433,7 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q)
 		/*
 		 * Initialize batch roundrobin counts
 		 */
-		hctx->next_cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask,
-				cpu_online_mask);
-		if (hctx->next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
-			hctx->next_cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
+		hctx->next_cpu = blk_mq_first_mapped_cpu(hctx);
 		hctx->next_cpu_batch = BLK_MQ_CPU_WORK_BATCH;
 	}
 }
-- 
2.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-08  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-08  9:48 [PATCH 0/8] blk-mq: fix and improve queue mapping Ming Lei
2018-04-08  9:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] blk-mq: make sure that correct hctx->next_cpu is set Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08  9:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] blk-mq: don't keep offline CPUs mapped to hctx 0 Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08  9:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: avoid to write intermediate result to hctx->next_cpu Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08  9:48 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-04-09 10:06   ` [PATCH 4/8] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_hw_queue_first_cpu() to figure out first cpu Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:02   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08  9:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] blk-mq: remove blk_mq_delay_queue() Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08  9:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] blk-mq: don't check queue mapped in __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08  9:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: reimplement blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-08  9:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: remove code for dealing with remapping queue Ming Lei
2018-04-09 10:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-04-09 11:03   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-04-09 10:13 ` [PATCH 0/8] blk-mq: fix and improve queue mapping Christian Borntraeger
2018-04-09 15:00 ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-09 15:48 ` Stefan Haberland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180408094814.28953-5-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).