From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benlong Zhang <zhangbenlong@didichuxing.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, shli@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] A tentative patch to bypass REQ_META in blk throttle
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:20:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180427122006.GA9380@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180426190118.GP1911913@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:01:18PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 06:06:01PM +0800, Benlong Zhang wrote:
> > One problem with cgwb is how fs should treat metadata bios.
> > For example in xfs, the log might be partially stuck in one
> > group, leaving threads in other groups waiting for too long.
> > Please refer to the linux-xfs discussion:
> > "[PATCH V2] xfs: implement cgroup writeback support"
> >
> > One approach is to correctly tag bio->bi_css from within the
> > filesystems (for xfs log should be blkcg_root), and the other
> > is to skip them, but relies on REQ_META being set.
> >
> > It works with xfs on a cgwb porting implementation to 3.10.0.
> > But really not sure about other filesystems...
>
> Yeah, Josef (cc'd) is working on a similar approach but in a more
> generic way.
>
I thought Josef's work had more to do with tracking/managing dirty
metadata (i.e., driving writeback/reclaim and whatnot). Perhaps I just
haven't followed it close enough... how does that relate to cgroup bio
ownership?
The issue addressed by this patch (wrt to XFS) is that log I/O that
happens to be submitted via a throttled cgroup ends up blocking
unthrottled tasks because the log is essentially a global/shared
mechanism. We therefore want to somehow exempt metadata I/O from
throttling in that particular case.
Note that I'm not familiar enough with the block layer code to know
whether this patch is the right way to do that, but I think (as noted in
the commit log above) that not doing the default bio association if the
fs hasn't (or associating with some root group) for metadata I/O would
also be sufficient. Hm?
Brian
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-27 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-20 10:06 [PATCH] A tentative patch to bypass REQ_META in blk throttle Benlong Zhang
2018-04-26 19:01 ` Tejun Heo
2018-04-27 12:20 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2018-04-27 12:34 ` Tejun Heo
2018-05-02 2:20 ` Benlong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180427122006.GA9380@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangbenlong@didichuxing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).