From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Scott Bauer <sbauer@plzdonthack.me>
Cc: Scott Bauer <scott.bauer@intel.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, hch@infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cdrom: Fix info leak/OOB read in cdrom_ioctl_drive_status
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 18:13:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180427151336.3u6x5z44ajansrbt@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c2bdace5-f513-476a-59b0-4062ffb5416e@plzdonthack.me>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 08:43:03AM -0600, Scott Bauer wrote:
>
>
> On 04/27/2018 06:41 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > I sent you an email to send this patch, but reviewing it now it's not
> > actually a run time bug. The cdrom_slot_status() function takes an
> > integer argument so it works.
>
> It's still� runtime bug... I should reword the commit a bit to reflect that it's not
> like the upper 32 bit issue that you had found. Look at it this way, ints can be negative, right?
>
Oh. Yeah. Duh...
> The check is as follows:
>
> 2545: if (((int)arg >= cdi->capacity))
> return -EINVAL <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.17-rc2/ident/EINVAL>;
> return cdrom_slot_status <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.17-rc2/ident/cdrom_slot_status>(cdi, arg); so if (-65536 >= cdi->capacity) it's not so we don't return -einval. And we pass a negative index into cdrom_slot_status.
>
>
> where we do the following (https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.17-rc2/source/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c#L1336):
>
> 1336:
> if (info->slots <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.17-rc2/ident/slots>[slot <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.17-rc2/ident/slot>].disc_present)
> ret = CDS_DISC_OK <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.17-rc2/ident/CDS_DISC_OK>;
>
>
>
> >
> > I'm working on a static checker warning for these kinds of bugs:
> >
> > drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c:2444 cdrom_ioctl_select_disc() warn: truncated comparison 'arg' 'u64max' to 's32max'
> >
> > drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c
> > 2435 static int cdrom_ioctl_select_disc(struct cdrom_device_info *cdi,
> > 2436 unsigned long arg)
> > 2437 {
> > 2438 cd_dbg(CD_DO_IOCTL, "entering CDROM_SELECT_DISC\n");
> > 2439
> > 2440 if (!CDROM_CAN(CDC_SELECT_DISC))
> > 2441 return -ENOSYS;
> > 2442
> > 2443 if (arg != CDSL_CURRENT && arg != CDSL_NONE) {
> > 2444 if ((int)arg >= cdi->capacity)
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > 2445 return -EINVAL;
> > 2446 }
> > 2447
> > 2448 /*
> > 2449 * ->select_disc is a hook to allow a driver-specific way of
> > 2450 * seleting disc. However, since there is no equivalent hook for
> > 2451 * cdrom_slot_status this may not actually be useful...
> > 2452 */
> > 2453 if (cdi->ops->select_disc)
> > 2454 return cdi->ops->select_disc(cdi, arg);
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > ->select_disc() also take an int so it's fine (plus there is no such
> > function so it's dead code).
> >
> > 2455
> > 2456 cd_dbg(CD_CHANGER, "Using generic cdrom_select_disc()\n");
> > 2457 return cdrom_select_disc(cdi, arg);
> > ^^^
> > Also an int.
> >
> > 2458 }
> >
> > So I think it's a good idea to fix these just for cleanliness and to
> > silence the static checker warnings but it doesn't affect runtime.
>
> Yeah, this one was "fine" aside from being messy, that's why I didn't send a patch for it.
>
I'm not convinced any more. Could you patch it and resend? We could
end up sending invalid commands to the cdrom firmware when we do
cdrom_load_unload() at the end of the cdrom_select_disc() function.
Proably there is no impact but we may as well fix it. Here is my
analysis if you are curious:
1371 /* If SLOT < 0, unload the current slot. Otherwise, try to load SLOT. */
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
CDSL_CURRENT is INT_MAX and CDSL_NONE is "INT_MAX - 1" but
cdrom_select_disc() calls this with slot set to -1.
1372 static int cdrom_load_unload(struct cdrom_device_info *cdi, int slot)
1373 {
1374 struct packet_command cgc;
1375
1376 cd_dbg(CD_CHANGER, "entering cdrom_load_unload()\n");
1377 if (cdi->sanyo_slot && slot < 0)
1378 return 0;
1379
1380 init_cdrom_command(&cgc, NULL, 0, CGC_DATA_NONE);
1381 cgc.cmd[0] = GPCMD_LOAD_UNLOAD;
1382 cgc.cmd[4] = 2 + (slot >= 0);
^^^^^^^^^^
So cmd[4] is 2.
1383 cgc.cmd[8] = slot;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Here were setting cmd[8] to any u8 value we choose.
1384 cgc.timeout = 60 * HZ;
1385
1386 /* The Sanyo 3 CD changer uses byte 7 of the
1387 GPCMD_TEST_UNIT_READY to command to switch CDs instead of
1388 using the GPCMD_LOAD_UNLOAD opcode. */
1389 if (cdi->sanyo_slot && -1 < slot) {
1390 cgc.cmd[0] = GPCMD_TEST_UNIT_READY;
1391 cgc.cmd[7] = slot;
1392 cgc.cmd[4] = cgc.cmd[8] = 0;
1393 cdi->sanyo_slot = slot ? slot : 3;
1394 }
1395
1396 return cdi->ops->generic_packet(cdi, &cgc);
1397 }
> P.S. Is your static analysis tooling available for the general public to look at?
Sure. I've been dorking with it for a couple days and I haven't tested
the latest version except on drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c so let me do some
more testing and then I'll post it.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-27 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-26 17:51 [PATCH] cdrom: Fix info leak/OOB read in cdrom_ioctl_drive_status Scott Bauer
2018-04-27 12:41 ` Dan Carpenter
2018-04-27 14:43 ` Scott Bauer
2018-04-27 15:13 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2018-08-29 12:48 ` Dan Carpenter
2018-08-29 14:09 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180427151336.3u6x5z44ajansrbt@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbauer@plzdonthack.me \
--cc=scott.bauer@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox