From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@linux.intel.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/9] nvme: pci: fix & improve timeout handling
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 18:33:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180515003335.GB15199@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180514234701.GA21743@ming.t460p>
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:47:07AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > [ 760.727485] nvme nvme1: EH 0: after recovery -19
> > > > [ 760.727488] nvme nvme1: EH: fail controller
> > >
> > > The above issue(hang in nvme_remove()) is still an old issue, which
> > > is because queues are kept as quiesce during remove, so could you
> > > please test the following change?
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> > > index 1dec353388be..c78e5a0cde06 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> > > @@ -3254,6 +3254,11 @@ void nvme_remove_namespaces(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> > > */
> > > if (ctrl->state == NVME_CTRL_DEAD)
> > > nvme_kill_queues(ctrl);
> > > + else {
> > > + if (ctrl->admin_q)
> > > + blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(ctrl->admin_q);
> > > + nvme_start_queues(ctrl);
> > > + }
> > >
> > > down_write(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
> > > list_splice_init(&ctrl->namespaces, &ns_list);
> >
> > The above won't actually do anything here since the broken link puts the
> > controller in the DEAD state, so we've killed the queues which also
> > unquiesces them.
>
> I suggest you to double check if the controller is set as DEAD
> in nvme_remove() since there won't be any log dumped when this happen.
Yes, it's dead. pci_device_is_present returns false when the link is
broken.
Also, the logs showed the capacity was set to 0, which only happens when
we kill the namespace queues, which supposedly restarts the queues too.
> If controller is set as DEAD and queues are killed, and all IO should
> have been dispatched to driver and nvme_queueu_rq() will fail them all,
> then there isn't any reason to see the hang in your stack trace log.
Right, that's the idea. It just doesn't appear to be working here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-15 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-11 12:29 [PATCH V5 0/9] nvme: pci: fix & improve timeout handling Ming Lei
2018-05-11 12:29 ` [PATCH V5 1/9] block: introduce blk_quiesce_timeout() and blk_unquiesce_timeout() Ming Lei
2018-05-11 12:29 ` [PATCH V5 2/9] nvme: pci: cover timeout for admin commands running in EH Ming Lei
2018-05-11 12:29 ` [PATCH V5 3/9] nvme: pci: only wait freezing if queue is frozen Ming Lei
2018-05-11 12:29 ` [PATCH V5 4/9] nvme: pci: freeze queue in nvme_dev_disable() in case of error recovery Ming Lei
2018-05-11 12:29 ` [PATCH V5 5/9] nvme: pci: prepare for supporting error recovery from resetting context Ming Lei
2018-05-11 12:29 ` [PATCH V5 6/9] nvme: pci: move error handling out of nvme_reset_dev() Ming Lei
2018-05-11 12:29 ` [PATCH V5 7/9] nvme: pci: don't unfreeze queue until controller state updating succeeds Ming Lei
2018-05-11 12:29 ` [PATCH V5 8/9] nvme: core: introduce nvme_force_change_ctrl_state() Ming Lei
2018-05-11 12:29 ` [PATCH V5 9/9] nvme: pci: support nested EH Ming Lei
2018-05-15 10:02 ` jianchao.wang
2018-05-15 12:39 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-11 20:50 ` [PATCH V5 0/9] nvme: pci: fix & improve timeout handling Keith Busch
2018-05-12 0:21 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-14 15:18 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-14 23:47 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-15 0:33 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-05-15 9:08 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-16 4:31 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-16 15:18 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-16 22:18 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-14 8:21 ` jianchao.wang
2018-05-14 9:38 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-14 10:05 ` jianchao.wang
2018-05-14 12:22 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-15 0:33 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-15 9:56 ` jianchao.wang
2018-05-15 12:56 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-16 3:03 ` jianchao.wang
2018-05-16 2:04 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-16 2:09 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-16 2:15 ` jianchao.wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180515003335.GB15199@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@linux.intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox