From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 12:13:09 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Cc: Kees Cook , "Martin K. Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , Tejun Heo , Borislav Petkov , "David S. Miller" , "Manoj N. Kumar" , "Matthew R. Ochs" , Uma Krishnan , linux-block , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] block: Create scsi_sense.h for SCSI and ATAPI Message-ID: <20180522191309.GA23615@infradead.org> References: <20180522181512.39316-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20180522181512.39316-4-keescook@chromium.org> <20180522183613.GA3784@infradead.org> <732f4249-5681-4a54-ec21-4ecc3d3a74e5@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <732f4249-5681-4a54-ec21-4ecc3d3a74e5@kernel.dk> List-ID: On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:09:41PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > I think Martin and Christoph are objecting to moving the code to > block/scsi_ioctl.h. I don't care too much about where the code is, but > think it would be nice to have the definitions in a separate header. But > if they prefer just pulling in all of SCSI for it, well then I guess > it's pointless to move the header bits. Seems very heavy handed to me, > though. It might be heavy handed for the 3 remaining users of drivers/ide, but as long as that stuff just keeps working I'd rather worry about everyone else, and keep the scsi code where it belongs.