From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Israel Rukshin <israelr@mellanox.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13] blk-mq: Rework blk-mq timeout handling again
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 14:33:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180522203349.GB8961@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180522162515.20650-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 09:25:15AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> @@ -848,13 +843,22 @@ static void blk_mq_rq_timed_out(struct request *req, bool reserved)
> case BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER:
> + blk_mq_add_timer(req);
> /*
> + * The loop is for the unlikely case of a race with the
> + * completion code. There is no need to reset the deadline
> + * if the transition to the in-flight state fails because
> + * the deadline only matters in the in-flight state.
> */
> - blk_mq_rq_update_aborted_gstate(req, 0);
> - blk_add_timer(req);
> + while (true) {
> + if (blk_mq_change_rq_state(req, MQ_RQ_TIMED_OUT,
> + MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT))
> + break;
> + if (blk_mq_rq_state(req) == MQ_RQ_COMPLETE) {
> + __blk_mq_complete_request(req);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
I'm having some trouble triggering this case where the state is already
MQ_RQ_COMPLETE, so I'm just trying to figure this out through inspection.
It looks like the new blk_mq_complete_request() already called
__blk_mq_complete_request() when it gets the state to MQ_RQ_COMPLETE,
so doing that again completes it a second time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-22 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-22 16:25 [PATCH v13] blk-mq: Rework blk-mq timeout handling again Bart Van Assche
2018-05-22 16:44 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22 17:17 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22 18:47 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22 19:03 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22 19:38 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22 20:26 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 20:29 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22 21:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-22 21:02 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22 20:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-22 20:38 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22 20:44 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-22 21:03 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-23 2:35 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 20:33 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-05-22 20:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-22 20:40 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 20:44 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 20:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-23 14:02 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-23 14:08 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180522203349.GB8961@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=israelr@mellanox.com \
--cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sebott@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox