From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Manoj N. Kumar" <manoj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Matthew R. Ochs" <mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Uma Krishnan <ukrishn@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] block: Create scsi_sense.h for SCSI and ATAPI
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 00:36:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180524073654.GA32083@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jLzNNejH1MEH3ct0hSyOtG1zk8=gE4Qpd2yDvQTSahL+w@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 02:17:14PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> True, though I'm finding other robustness issues in the CDROM code.
> They're probably all insane corner cases, but it seems like it'd be
> nice to just fix them:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c b/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c
> index 3522d2cae1b6..7726c8618c30 100644
> --- a/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c
> +++ b/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c
> @@ -2222,9 +2223,12 @@ static int cdrom_read_cdda_bpc(struct
> cdrom_device_info *cdi, __u8 __user *ubuf,
>
> blk_execute_rq(q, cdi->disk, rq, 0);
> if (scsi_req(rq)->result) {
> - struct request_sense *s = req->sense;
> + struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;
> +
> ret = -EIO;
> - cdi->last_sense = s->sense_key;
> + scsi_normalize_sense(req->sense, req->sense_len,
> + &sshdr);
> + cdi->last_sense = sshdr.sense_key;
> }
>
> if (blk_rq_unmap_user(bio))
The proper fix here is to rewrite this function to use the the
->generic_packet cdrom_device_ops method. Is is the only caller
going straight to the scsi passthrough requests, which is a layering
violation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-24 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-22 18:15 [PATCH 0/6] block: Consolidate scsi sense buffer usage Kees Cook
2018-05-22 18:15 ` [PATCH 1/6] ide-cd: Drop unused sense buffers Kees Cook
2018-05-22 18:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-22 18:15 ` [PATCH 2/6] scsi: cxlflash: " Kees Cook
2018-05-22 18:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-22 21:03 ` Matthew R. Ochs
2018-05-22 18:15 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: Create scsi_sense.h for SCSI and ATAPI Kees Cook
2018-05-22 18:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-22 18:50 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-05-22 18:59 ` Kees Cook
2018-05-22 19:09 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22 19:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-22 19:16 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22 23:31 ` Kees Cook
2018-05-22 23:34 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-22 23:39 ` Kees Cook
2018-05-22 23:41 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-22 23:42 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22 23:49 ` Kees Cook
2018-05-23 14:13 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-23 14:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-23 14:31 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-23 20:52 ` Kees Cook
2018-05-23 21:06 ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-05-23 21:17 ` Kees Cook
2018-05-24 7:36 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-05-23 21:14 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-23 21:20 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-23 21:22 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-23 21:23 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-05-24 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-24 17:06 ` Kees Cook
2018-05-25 14:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-08 20:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-09 15:56 ` Kees Cook
2018-07-31 7:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-31 19:52 ` Kees Cook
2018-05-22 18:15 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: Consolidate scsi sense buffer usage Kees Cook
2018-05-22 18:15 ` [PATCH 5/6] libata-scsi: Move sense buffers onto stack Kees Cook
2018-05-22 18:15 ` [PATCH 6/6] scsi: Check sense buffer size at build time Kees Cook
2018-05-23 8:25 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2018-05-23 21:08 ` Kees Cook
2018-05-24 14:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180524073654.GA32083@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manoj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ukrishn@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).