public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] block: simplify bio_check_pages_dirty
Date: Mon,  4 Jun 2018 15:58:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180604135853.30972-2-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180604135853.30972-1-hch@lst.de>

bio_check_pages_dirty currently inviolates the invariant that bv_page of
a bio_vec inside bi_vcnt shouldn't be zero, and that is going to become
really annoying with multpath biovecs.  Fortunately there isn't any
all that good reason for it - once we decide to defer freeing the bio
to a workqueue holding onto a few additional pages isn't really an
issue anymore.  So just check if there is a clean page that needs
dirtying in the first path, and do a second pass to free them if there
was none, while the cache is still hot.

Also use the chance to micro-optimize bio_dirty_fn a bit by not saving
irq state - we know we are called from a workqueue.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 block/bio.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
index 53e0f0a1ed94..50941c1c9118 100644
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -1590,19 +1590,15 @@ static void bio_release_pages(struct bio *bio)
 	struct bio_vec *bvec;
 	int i;
 
-	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, i) {
-		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
-
-		if (page)
-			put_page(page);
-	}
+	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, i)
+		put_page(bvec->bv_page);
 }
 
 /*
  * bio_check_pages_dirty() will check that all the BIO's pages are still dirty.
  * If they are, then fine.  If, however, some pages are clean then they must
  * have been written out during the direct-IO read.  So we take another ref on
- * the BIO and the offending pages and re-dirty the pages in process context.
+ * the BIO and re-dirty the pages in process context.
  *
  * It is expected that bio_check_pages_dirty() will wholly own the BIO from
  * here on.  It will run one put_page() against each page and will run one
@@ -1620,52 +1616,42 @@ static struct bio *bio_dirty_list;
  */
 static void bio_dirty_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
-	struct bio *bio;
+	struct bio *bio, *next;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&bio_dirty_lock, flags);
-	bio = bio_dirty_list;
+	spin_lock_irq(&bio_dirty_lock);
+	next = bio_dirty_list;
 	bio_dirty_list = NULL;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bio_dirty_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&bio_dirty_lock);
 
-	while (bio) {
-		struct bio *next = bio->bi_private;
+	while ((bio = next) != NULL) {
+		next = bio->bi_private;
 
 		bio_set_pages_dirty(bio);
 		bio_release_pages(bio);
 		bio_put(bio);
-		bio = next;
 	}
 }
 
 void bio_check_pages_dirty(struct bio *bio)
 {
 	struct bio_vec *bvec;
-	int nr_clean_pages = 0;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int i;
 
 	bio_for_each_segment_all(bvec, bio, i) {
-		struct page *page = bvec->bv_page;
-
-		if (PageDirty(page) || PageCompound(page)) {
-			put_page(page);
-			bvec->bv_page = NULL;
-		} else {
-			nr_clean_pages++;
-		}
+		if (!PageDirty(bvec->bv_page) && !PageCompound(bvec->bv_page))
+			goto defer;
 	}
 
-	if (nr_clean_pages) {
-		unsigned long flags;
-
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&bio_dirty_lock, flags);
-		bio->bi_private = bio_dirty_list;
-		bio_dirty_list = bio;
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bio_dirty_lock, flags);
-		schedule_work(&bio_dirty_work);
-	} else {
-		bio_put(bio);
-	}
+	bio_release_pages(bio);
+	bio_put(bio);
+	return;
+defer:
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&bio_dirty_lock, flags);
+	bio->bi_private = bio_dirty_list;
+	bio_dirty_list = bio;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bio_dirty_lock, flags);
+	schedule_work(&bio_dirty_work);
 }
 
 void generic_start_io_acct(struct request_queue *q, int rw,
-- 
2.14.2

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-04 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-04 13:58 a few cleanups to prepare for multipage bio_vecs Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-04 13:58 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-06-05  3:23   ` [PATCH 1/3] block: simplify bio_check_pages_dirty Ming Lei
2018-06-04 13:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: bio_set_pages_dirty can't see NULL bv_page in a valid bio_vec Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-05  3:28   ` Ming Lei
2018-06-04 13:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: use bio_add_page in bio_iov_iter_get_pages Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-05  3:41   ` Ming Lei
2018-06-05  3:42     ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180604135853.30972-2-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox