From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:44970 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935659AbeFMOo0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:44:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 07:44:12 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ming Lei Cc: Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Alexander Viro , Kent Overstreet , David Sterba , Huang Ying , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Theodore Ts'o , "Darrick J . Wong" , Coly Li , Filipe Manana , Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 11/30] block: implement bio_pages_all() via bio_for_each_segment_all() Message-ID: <20180613144412.GB4693@infradead.org> References: <20180609123014.8861-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20180609123014.8861-12-ming.lei@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20180609123014.8861-12-ming.lei@redhat.com> Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Given that we have a single, dubious user of bio_pages_all I'd rather see it as an opencoded bio_for_each_ loop in the caller.