From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: why does __split_and_process_bio use bio_clone_bioset?
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:08:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180614200808.GA46373@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180614181245.GA1161@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 14 2018 at 2:12P -0400,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14 2018 at 4:19am -0400,
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Neil,
> >
> > In commit 18a25da8 ("dm: ensure bio submission follows a depth-first
> > tree walk") you've added a call to bio_clone_bioset to
> > __split_and_process_bio. Unlike all other bio splitting code this
> > actually allocates a new bio_vec array instead of just splitting the bio
> > and the iterator. I can't actually find a good reason for that either
> > in a cursory review of the code, the commit or the comments.
> >
> > Do you remember why this can't just use bio_clone_fast?
>
> Your question caused me to revisit this code and it is suspect for a
> couple reasons:
>
> 1) I'm also not seeing why we need bio_clone_bioset()
The patch below seems to work fine (given quick testing).. It also has a
side-effect of not breaking integrity support (which commit 18a25da8
appears to do because it isn't accounting for any of the integrity stuff
bio_split, or dm.c:clone_bio, does).
FYI, my other concerns in my my previous reply were unfounded and due to
misreading the existing code.
Neil, please still feel free to have a look at this to see if you can
recall why you used bio_clone_bioset().
If in the end you agree that the following patch is fine please let me
know and I'll get a proper fix staged.
Thanks,
Mike
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
index 20a8d63..dfb4783 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -1582,10 +1582,9 @@ static blk_qc_t __split_and_process_bio(struct mapped_device *md,
* the usage of io->orig_bio in dm_remap_zone_report()
* won't be affected by this reassignment.
*/
- struct bio *b = bio_clone_bioset(bio, GFP_NOIO,
- &md->queue->bio_split);
+ struct bio *b = bio_split(bio, bio_sectors(bio) - ci.sector_count,
+ GFP_NOIO, &md->queue->bio_split);
ci.io->orig_bio = b;
- bio_advance(bio, (bio_sectors(bio) - ci.sector_count) << 9);
bio_chain(b, bio);
ret = generic_make_request(bio);
break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-14 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-14 8:19 why does __split_and_process_bio use bio_clone_bioset? Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-14 18:12 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-06-14 20:08 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2018-06-14 23:34 ` [dm-devel] " NeilBrown
2018-06-15 7:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-15 18:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-06-16 15:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180614200808.GA46373@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).