From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <keith.busch@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 12:47:12 -0600
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@linux.intel.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"keith.busch@intel.com" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"ming.lei@redhat.com" <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Remove generation seqeunce
Message-ID: <20180713184712.GA19419@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20180521231131.6685-1-keith.busch@intel.com>
 <20180521231131.6685-4-keith.busch@intel.com>
 <c42d13289e38df93bb35e9876b803420e40b03d3.camel@wdc.com>
 <20180712192437.GA16839@localhost.localdomain>
 <7cad25b821c3a640e036f28ff1bbe51e7362d25d.camel@wdc.com>
 <20180713154346.GA18955@localhost.localdomain>
 <a32b251bd3c0a186e5c5ba82656a85fbdcc0c5e4.camel@wdc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <a32b251bd3c0a186e5c5ba82656a85fbdcc0c5e4.camel@wdc.com>
List-ID: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 03:52:38PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> No. What I'm saying is that a behavior change has been introduced in the block
> layer that was not documented in the patch description. 

Did you read the changelog?

> I think that behavior change even can trigger a kernel crash.

I think we are past acknowledging issues exist with timeouts.