From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 21:50:08 +0200 From: "hch@lst.de" To: Ming Lei Cc: Bart Van Assche , "hch@lst.de" , "jthumshirn@suse.de" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" , "hare@suse.de" , "axboe@kernel.dk" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "stern@rowland.harvard.edu" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "adrian.hunter@intel.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/3] scsi_mq: enable runtime PM Message-ID: <20180717195008.GA28809@lst.de> References: <20180713080602.31602-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20180713080602.31602-4-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20180717132411.GI13582@lst.de> <20180717153031.GA8973@ming.t460p> <07874eaab2d93728afe3f220cd0efa8f41d4955a.camel@wdc.com> <20180717153847.GB8973@ming.t460p> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20180717153847.GB8973@ming.t460p> List-ID: On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:38:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > As I said, it is any sd/sr device, which can be put down by runtime PM > via START_STOP command if it isn't used for a while. And in which case do we care that this happens?