From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@linux.intel.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"keith.busch@intel.com" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: set timed out out mq requests to complete
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 10:23:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180720162321.GG4093@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <092dd4f2dae0cc533018c9fb829a50b4cbb6cb0b.camel@wdc.com>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 04:20:01PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 10:12 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 04:03:18PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 09:56 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > > SCSI is the only block driver that wants this behavior. Moving it back
> > > > to generic where it used to be breaks other block drivers.
> > >
> > > That's new to me. What would break in the NVMe driver if the above change would be
> > > present in the block layer?
> >
> > This is what causes the block layer to lose completions, and most drivers
> > don't want the kernel to lose their completions.
>
> Hello Keith,
>
> Have you considered to introduce a fourth state for block layer requests to
> avoid that completions that occur while a timeout handler is in progress get
> lost? That would avoid that completions get lost not only for the NVMe driver
> but also for SCSI drivers. See e.g. the MQ_RQ_TIMED_OUT state in
> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-block@vger.kernel.org/msg22196.html
Yes, I've considered that, and I really want to use it, but scsi may
still reference a freed request in scmd_eh_abort_handler that way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-20 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-19 21:26 [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: export setting request completion state Keith Busch
2018-07-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: set timed out out mq requests to complete Keith Busch
2018-07-20 6:52 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-07-20 14:05 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-20 14:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-20 14:50 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-20 15:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-20 15:56 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-20 16:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-20 16:12 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-20 16:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-20 16:23 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-07-20 16:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-20 17:24 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-23 8:12 ` hch
2018-07-23 13:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-23 14:04 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-23 8:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: export setting request completion state Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180720162321.GG4093@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox