From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: [PATCH v6 03/12] scsi: Only set RQF_DV for requests used for domain validation
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 12:41:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180809194149.15285-4-bart.vanassche@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180809194149.15285-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Instead of setting RQF_DV for all requests submitted by scsi_execute(),
only set that flag for requests that are used for domain validation.
Move the SCSI Parallel Interface (SPI) domain validation status from
the transport data to struct scsi_target such that this status
information can be accessed easily from inside scsi_execute(). This
patch prevents that e.g. event checking can occur during domain
validation.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 6 ++++--
drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c | 9 +++------
include/scsi/scsi_device.h | 1 +
include/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.h | 1 -
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 8685704f6c8b..4d7411a7985f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -268,8 +268,10 @@ int __scsi_execute(struct scsi_device *sdev, const unsigned char *cmd,
if (rq_flags & RQF_PM)
blk_mq_req_flags |= BLK_MQ_REQ_PM;
- rq_flags |= RQF_DV;
- blk_mq_req_flags |= BLK_MQ_REQ_DV;
+ if (scsi_target(sdev)->spi_dv_context == current) {
+ rq_flags |= RQF_DV;
+ blk_mq_req_flags |= BLK_MQ_REQ_DV;
+ }
req = blk_get_request(sdev->request_queue,
data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE ?
REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT : REQ_OP_SCSI_IN, blk_mq_req_flags);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c
index 2ca150b16764..bf6b18768e79 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c
@@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ static struct {
};
/* Private data accessors (keep these out of the header file) */
-#define spi_dv_in_progress(x) (((struct spi_transport_attrs *)&(x)->starget_data)->dv_in_progress)
#define spi_dv_mutex(x) (((struct spi_transport_attrs *)&(x)->starget_data)->dv_mutex)
struct spi_internal {
@@ -268,7 +267,6 @@ static int spi_setup_transport_attrs(struct transport_container *tc,
spi_pcomp_en(starget) = 0;
spi_hold_mcs(starget) = 0;
spi_dv_pending(starget) = 0;
- spi_dv_in_progress(starget) = 0;
spi_initial_dv(starget) = 0;
mutex_init(&spi_dv_mutex(starget));
@@ -1018,14 +1016,12 @@ spi_dv_device(struct scsi_device *sdev)
*/
lock_system_sleep();
- if (unlikely(spi_dv_in_progress(starget)))
+ if (unlikely(starget->spi_dv_context))
goto unlock;
if (unlikely(scsi_device_get(sdev)))
goto unlock;
- spi_dv_in_progress(starget) = 1;
-
buffer = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(!buffer))
@@ -1043,7 +1039,9 @@ spi_dv_device(struct scsi_device *sdev)
starget_printk(KERN_INFO, starget, "Beginning Domain Validation\n");
+ starget->spi_dv_context = current;
spi_dv_device_internal(sdev, buffer);
+ starget->spi_dv_context = NULL;
starget_printk(KERN_INFO, starget, "Ending Domain Validation\n");
@@ -1057,7 +1055,6 @@ spi_dv_device(struct scsi_device *sdev)
out_free:
kfree(buffer);
out_put:
- spi_dv_in_progress(starget) = 0;
scsi_device_put(sdev);
unlock:
unlock_system_sleep();
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
index 202f4d6a4342..440834f4252e 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ struct scsi_target {
char scsi_level;
enum scsi_target_state state;
+ struct task_struct *spi_dv_context;
void *hostdata; /* available to low-level driver */
unsigned long starget_data[0]; /* for the transport */
/* starget_data must be the last element!!!! */
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.h b/include/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.h
index a4fa52b4d5c5..36934ac0a5ca 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.h
@@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ struct spi_transport_attrs {
unsigned int support_qas; /* supports quick arbitration and selection */
/* Private Fields */
unsigned int dv_pending:1; /* Internal flag: DV Requested */
- unsigned int dv_in_progress:1; /* Internal: DV started */
struct mutex dv_mutex; /* semaphore to serialise dv */
};
--
2.18.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-09 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-09 19:41 [PATCH v6 00/12] blk-mq: Implement runtime power management Bart Van Assche
2018-08-09 19:41 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] block, scsi: Introduce request flag RQF_DV Bart Van Assche
2018-08-09 19:41 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] scsi: Alter handling of RQF_DV requests Bart Van Assche
2018-08-10 1:20 ` Ming Lei
2018-08-10 15:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-08-09 19:41 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-08-09 19:41 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] scsi: Introduce the SDEV_SUSPENDED device status Bart Van Assche
2018-08-09 19:41 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] block, scsi: Rename QUEUE_FLAG_PREEMPT_ONLY into DV_ONLY and introduce PM_ONLY Bart Van Assche
2018-08-10 1:39 ` jianchao.wang
2018-08-10 15:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-08-09 19:41 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] scsi: Reallow SPI domain validation during system suspend Bart Van Assche
2018-08-09 19:41 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] block: Move power management code into a new source file Bart Van Assche
2018-08-09 19:41 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] block, scsi: Introduce blk_pm_runtime_exit() Bart Van Assche
2018-08-10 2:39 ` jianchao.wang
2018-08-10 15:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-08-10 16:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-08-13 9:24 ` jianchao.wang
2018-08-13 16:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-08-09 19:41 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] block: Split blk_pm_add_request() and blk_pm_put_request() Bart Van Assche
2018-08-09 19:41 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] block: Change the runtime power management approach (1/2) Bart Van Assche
2018-08-10 1:59 ` jianchao.wang
2018-08-10 15:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-08-09 19:41 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] block: Change the runtime power management approach (2/2) Bart Van Assche
2018-08-10 1:51 ` jianchao.wang
2018-08-10 15:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-08-09 19:41 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] blk-mq: Enable support for runtime power management Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180809194149.15285-4-bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox