From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:53970 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727394AbeHJMpA (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2018 08:45:00 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 12:15:41 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Ming Lei Cc: Felipe Franciosi , stable@vger.kernel.org, "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , Omar Sandoval , "Martin K. Petersen" , James Bottomley , Christoph Hellwig , Don Brace , Kashyap Desai , Paolo Bonzini , Mike Snitzer , Laurence Oberman , "Greg A. Smith" , Peter Turschmid Subject: Re: Fix for 84676c1f (b5b6e8c8) missing in 4.14.y Message-ID: <20180810101541.GB31002@kroah.com> References: <53EA26B1-86F8-40BF-A128-33137217A3F9@nutanix.com> <20180810023128.GB2816@ming.t460p> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20180810023128.GB2816@ming.t460p> Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:31:29AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 02:09:01AM +0000, Felipe Franciosi wrote: > > Hi Ming (and all), > > > > Your series "scsi: virtio_scsi: fix IO hang caused by irq vector automatic affinity" which forces virtio-scsi to use blk-mq fixes an issue introduced by 84676c1f. We noticed that this bug also exists in 4.14.y (as ef86f3a72adb), but your series was not backported to that stable branch. > > > > Are there any plans to do that? At least CoreOS is using 4.14 and showing issues on AHV (which provides an mq virtio-scsi controller). > > > > Hi Felipe, > > Looks the following 4 patches should have been marked as stable, sorry > for missing that. > > b5b6e8c8d3b4 scsi: virtio_scsi: fix IO hang caused by automatic irq vector affinity > 2f31115e940c scsi: core: introduce force_blk_mq > adbe552349f2 scsi: megaraid_sas: fix selection of reply queue > 8b834bff1b73 scsi: hpsa: fix selection of reply queue > > Usually this backporting is done by our stable guys, so I will CC stable > and leave them handle it, but I am happy to provide any help for > addressing conflicts or sort of thing. As the above patches do not apply "cleanly" to the 4.14.y tree at all, can you please provide a set of backported patches that I can apply? thanks, greg k-h