From: Valentin Vidic <Valentin.Vidic@CARNet.hr>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-blkback: Switch to closed state after releasing the backing device
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 00:19:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180906221929.GZ26705@gavran.carpriv.carnet.hr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180906162932.7qge5dmrgyqbmbbj@mac.bytemobile.com>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 06:29:32PM +0200, Roger Pau Monn� wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:28:01PM +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 01:35:15PM +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> > > > AFAICT, this will cause the backend to never switch to 'Closed' state
> > > > until the toolstack sets online to 0, which is not good IMO.
> > > >
> > > > If for example a frontend decides to close a device, the backend will
> > > > stay in state 'Closing' until the toolstack actually removes the disk
> > > > by setting online to 0.
> > > >
> > > > This will prevent resetting blk connections, as blkback will refuse to
> > > > switch to state XenbusStateInitWait unless it's at XenbusStateClosed
> > > > (see the XenbusStateInitialising case in frontend_changed), which will
> > > > never be reached with your patch.
> >
> > Would it be possible to call xen_vbd_free before the state change?
> >
> > case XenbusStateClosed:
> > xen_blkif_disconnect(be->blkif);
> > xen_vbd_free(&be->blkif->vbd);
> > xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateClosed);
>
> I think that will break reconnection, since xen_vbd_create is only
> called after hotplug script execution is performed (which happens only
> once at device attachment), but not when DomU changes frontend
> state.
>
> If you want to perform this xen_vbd_free you will also have to move
> the xen_vbd_create call AFAICT, to a place that's also called when
> reconnecting a device. Note that I could be wrong, so it might be
> worth a shot to try different approaches since the blkback code is
> quite tangled and I might miss something.
It seems like the Closed state is not a good point to call the remove
script since the device could go back from Closed to Connected.
Maybe it would help to introduce a new final state (7 = XenbusStateFree
or XenbusStateRemove) that would be set after xen_vbd_free to let the
userspace know it is safe to run the remove script?
static void xen_blkif_free(struct xen_blkif *blkif)
{
WARN_ON(xen_blkif_disconnect(blkif));
xen_vbd_free(&blkif->vbd);
xenbus_switch_state(blkif->be->dev, XenbusStateFree);
kfree(blkif->be->mode);
kfree(blkif->be);
/* Make sure everything is drained before shutting down */
kmem_cache_free(xen_blkif_cachep, blkif);
}
--
Valentin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-06 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-29 6:52 [PATCH] xen-blkback: Switch to closed state after releasing the backing device Valentin Vidic
2018-08-29 8:16 ` Juergen Gross
2018-08-29 8:27 ` Valentin Vidic
2018-08-29 8:43 ` Juergen Gross
2018-08-29 9:23 ` Valentin Vidic
2018-08-29 9:29 ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-05 10:36 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-05 16:27 ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-06 16:14 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-06 22:03 ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-07 12:03 ` [DRBD-user] " Lars Ellenberg
2018-09-07 12:13 ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-07 13:28 ` Lars Ellenberg
2018-09-07 16:45 ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-07 17:14 ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-08 7:34 ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-10 12:45 ` Lars Ellenberg
2018-09-10 13:22 ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-10 15:00 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-10 16:18 ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-13 15:08 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-14 11:49 ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-14 16:18 ` Roger Pau Monné
[not found] ` <20180905113515.GU26705@gavran.carpriv.carnet.hr>
2018-09-05 16:28 ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-06 16:29 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-06 22:19 ` Valentin Vidic [this message]
2018-09-07 7:15 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-07 7:23 ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-07 7:54 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-07 10:20 ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-07 10:43 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-07 11:15 ` Valentin Vidic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180906221929.GZ26705@gavran.carpriv.carnet.hr \
--to=valentin.vidic@carnet.hr \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=drbd-user@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox