public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentin Vidic <Valentin.Vidic@CARNet.hr>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-blkback: Switch to closed state after releasing the backing device
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 00:19:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180906221929.GZ26705@gavran.carpriv.carnet.hr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180906162932.7qge5dmrgyqbmbbj@mac.bytemobile.com>

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 06:29:32PM +0200, Roger Pau Monn� wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:28:01PM +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 01:35:15PM +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> > > > AFAICT, this will cause the backend to never switch to 'Closed' state
> > > > until the toolstack sets online to 0, which is not good IMO.
> > > > 
> > > > If for example a frontend decides to close a device, the backend will
> > > > stay in state 'Closing' until the toolstack actually removes the disk
> > > > by setting online to 0.
> > > > 
> > > > This will prevent resetting blk connections, as blkback will refuse to
> > > > switch to state XenbusStateInitWait unless it's at XenbusStateClosed
> > > > (see the XenbusStateInitialising case in frontend_changed), which will
> > > > never be reached with your patch.
> > 
> > Would it be possible to call xen_vbd_free before the state change?
> > 
> >         case XenbusStateClosed:
> >                 xen_blkif_disconnect(be->blkif);
> >                 xen_vbd_free(&be->blkif->vbd);
> >                 xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateClosed);
> 
> I think that will break reconnection, since xen_vbd_create is only
> called after hotplug script execution is performed (which happens only
> once at device attachment), but not when DomU changes frontend
> state.
> 
> If you want to perform this xen_vbd_free you will also have to move
> the xen_vbd_create call AFAICT, to a place that's also called when
> reconnecting a device. Note that I could be wrong, so it might be
> worth a shot to try different approaches since the blkback code is
> quite tangled and I might miss something.

It seems like the Closed state is not a good point to call the remove
script since the device could go back from Closed to Connected.

Maybe it would help to introduce a new final state (7 = XenbusStateFree
or XenbusStateRemove) that would be set after xen_vbd_free to let the
userspace know it is safe to run the remove script?

static void xen_blkif_free(struct xen_blkif *blkif)
{

        WARN_ON(xen_blkif_disconnect(blkif));
        xen_vbd_free(&blkif->vbd);
        xenbus_switch_state(blkif->be->dev, XenbusStateFree);
        kfree(blkif->be->mode);
        kfree(blkif->be);

        /* Make sure everything is drained before shutting down */
        kmem_cache_free(xen_blkif_cachep, blkif);
}

-- 
Valentin

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-06 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-29  6:52 [PATCH] xen-blkback: Switch to closed state after releasing the backing device Valentin Vidic
2018-08-29  8:16 ` Juergen Gross
2018-08-29  8:27   ` Valentin Vidic
2018-08-29  8:43     ` Juergen Gross
2018-08-29  9:23       ` Valentin Vidic
2018-08-29  9:29         ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-05 10:36 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-05 16:27   ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-06 16:14     ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-06 22:03       ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-07 12:03     ` [DRBD-user] " Lars Ellenberg
2018-09-07 12:13       ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-07 13:28         ` Lars Ellenberg
2018-09-07 16:45           ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-07 17:14             ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-08  7:34               ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-10 12:45                 ` Lars Ellenberg
2018-09-10 13:22                   ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-10 15:00                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-10 16:18                       ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-13 15:08                         ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-14 11:49                           ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-14 16:18                             ` Roger Pau Monné
     [not found]   ` <20180905113515.GU26705@gavran.carpriv.carnet.hr>
2018-09-05 16:28     ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-06 16:29       ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-06 22:19         ` Valentin Vidic [this message]
2018-09-07  7:15           ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-07  7:23             ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-07  7:54               ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-07 10:20                 ` Valentin Vidic
2018-09-07 10:43                   ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-07 11:15                     ` Valentin Vidic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180906221929.GZ26705@gavran.carpriv.carnet.hr \
    --to=valentin.vidic@carnet.hr \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=drbd-user@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox