public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@gmail.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>,
	Mariusz Dabrowski <mariusz.dabrowski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: make sure discard bio is aligned with logical block size
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:42:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181029024239.GB32606@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181028154947.GB3061@lst.de>

On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 04:49:47PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 08:51:31AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 09:44:15AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > >  		if (req_sects > UINT_MAX >> 9)
> > > > -			req_sects = UINT_MAX >> 9;
> > > > +			req_sects = (UINT_MAX >> 9) & ~bs_mask;
> > > 
> > > Given that we have this same thing duplicated in write zeroes
> > > what about a documented helper?
> > 
> > IMO, using UINT_MAX & bs_mask is better because it is self-explanatory
> > in the context.
> 
> I don't think it is in any way.  I understand it because I know the
> code, but there is nothing that documents why we do that.

Then how about introducing this helper?

 /*
+ * The max sectors one bio can handle is 'UINT_MAX >> 9' becasue
+ * bvec_iter.bi_size is defined as 'unsigned int', also it has to aligned
+ * to with logical block size which is minimum accepted unit by hardware.
+ */
+static inline unsigned int blk_max_allowed_max_secotrs(struct request_queue *q)
+{
+       return round_down(UINT_MAX, queue_logical_block_size(q)) >> 9;
+}
+
+/*

Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-29  2:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-26  6:24 [PATCH 0/3] block: make sure discard/writesame bio is aligned with logical block size Ming Lei
2018-10-26  6:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: make sure discard " Ming Lei
2018-10-26  7:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-28  0:51     ` Ming Lei
2018-10-28 15:49       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-29  2:42         ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-10-26  6:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: cleanup __blkdev_issue_discard() Ming Lei
2018-10-26  7:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-26  6:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: make sure writesame bio is aligned with logical block size Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181029024239.GB32606@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mariusz.dabrowski@intel.com \
    --cc=rsalvaterra@gmail.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox