public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jianchao . wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] SCSI: fix queue cleanup race before queue initialization is done
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:25:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181114082551.12141-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)

c2856ae2f315d ("blk-mq: quiesce queue before freeing queue") has
already fixed this race, however the implied synchronize_rcu()
in blk_mq_quiesce_queue() can slow down LUN probe a lot, so caused
performance regression.

Then 1311326cf4755c7 ("blk-mq: avoid to synchronize rcu inside blk_cleanup_queue()")
tried to quiesce queue for avoiding unnecessary synchronize_rcu()
only when queue initialization is done, because it is usual to see
lots of inexistent LUNs which need to be probed.

However, turns out it isn't safe to quiesce queue only when queue
initialization is done. Because when one SCSI command is completed,
the user of sending command can be waken up immediately, then the
scsi device may be removed, meantime the run queue in scsi_end_request()
is still in-progress, so kernel panic can be caused.

In Red Hat QE lab, there are several reports about this kind of kernel
panic triggered during kernel booting.

This patch tries to address the issue by grabing one queue usage
counter during freeing one request and the following run queue.

Fixes: 1311326cf4755c7 ("blk-mq: avoid to synchronize rcu inside blk_cleanup_queue()")
Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: James E.J. Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: jianchao.wang <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-core.c        | 5 ++---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index ce12515f9b9b..deb56932f8c4 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -798,9 +798,8 @@ void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *q)
 	 * dispatch may still be in-progress since we dispatch requests
 	 * from more than one contexts.
 	 *
-	 * No need to quiesce queue if it isn't initialized yet since
-	 * blk_freeze_queue() should be enough for cases of passthrough
-	 * request.
+	 * We rely on driver to deal with the race in case that queue
+	 * initialization isn't done.
 	 */
 	if (q->mq_ops && blk_queue_init_done(q))
 		blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index c7fccbb8f554..fa6e0c3b3aa6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -697,6 +697,12 @@ static bool scsi_end_request(struct request *req, blk_status_t error,
 		 */
 		scsi_mq_uninit_cmd(cmd);
 
+		/*
+		 * queue is still alive, so grab the ref for preventing it
+		 * from being cleaned up during running queue.
+		 */
+		percpu_ref_get(&q->q_usage_counter);
+
 		__blk_mq_end_request(req, error);
 
 		if (scsi_target(sdev)->single_lun ||
@@ -704,6 +710,8 @@ static bool scsi_end_request(struct request *req, blk_status_t error,
 			kblockd_schedule_work(&sdev->requeue_work);
 		else
 			blk_mq_run_hw_queues(q, true);
+
+		percpu_ref_put(&q->q_usage_counter);
 	} else {
 		unsigned long flags;
 
-- 
2.9.5


             reply	other threads:[~2018-11-14  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-14  8:25 Ming Lei [this message]
2018-11-14 15:02 ` [PATCH V2] SCSI: fix queue cleanup race before queue initialization is done Bart Van Assche
2018-11-15  0:48   ` Ming Lei
2018-11-14 15:20 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-15  1:02   ` Ming Lei
2018-11-21 21:47   ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-21 22:02     ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-11-22  3:43       ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-11-22  1:00     ` Ming Lei
2018-11-22  1:42       ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-22  2:00         ` Ming Lei
2018-11-22  2:14           ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-22  2:47             ` Ming Lei
2019-03-29 20:21         ` James Smart
2019-03-29 23:22           ` Ming Lei
2019-03-31  3:11           ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181114082551.12141-1-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox