linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] nvme: don't disable local ints for polled queue
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:37:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181114153706.GA11416@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181114084322.GA14954@infradead.org>

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:43:22AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> static int nvme_poll_noirq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned int tag)
> {
>         struct nvme_queue *nvmeq = hctx->driver_data;
> >  	u16 start, end;
> 	bool found;
> >  
> >  	if (!nvme_cqe_pending(nvmeq))
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > +	spin_lock(&nvmeq->cq_lock);
> >  	found = nvme_process_cq(nvmeq, &start, &end, tag);
> > +	spin_unlock(&nvmeq->cq_lock);
> > +
> >  	nvme_complete_cqes(nvmeq, start, end);
> >  	return found;
> 
> And while we are at it:  I think for the irq-driven queues in a
> separate queue for poll setup we might not even need to take the
> CQ lock.  Which might be an argument for only allowing polling
> if we have the separate queues just to keep everything simple.

That's a pretty cool observation. We still poll interrupt driven queues
in the timeout path as a sanity check (it really has helped in debugging
timeout issues), but we can temporarily disable the cq's irq and be
lockless.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-14 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-10 15:13 [PATCHSET 0/6] Various block optimizations Jens Axboe
2018-11-10 15:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] nvme: don't disable local ints for polled queue Jens Axboe
2018-11-14  8:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-14 15:31     ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-14 15:37     ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-11-14 10:18   ` Max Gurtovoy
2018-11-10 15:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: add queue_is_mq() helper Jens Axboe
2018-11-10 15:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] blk-mq: embed blk_mq_ops directly in the request queue Jens Axboe
2018-11-14 15:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-14 15:33     ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-14 15:39       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-14 15:47         ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-14 15:58           ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-10 15:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: avoid ordered task state change for polled IO Jens Axboe
2018-11-12  9:35   ` jianchao.wang
2018-11-12 16:26     ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-12 16:26       ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-13  2:02       ` jianchao.wang
2018-11-10 15:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] blk-rq-qos: inline check for q->rq_qos functions Jens Axboe
2018-11-14 15:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-14 15:33     ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-14 15:40       ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-14 17:16         ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-10 15:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] block: add polled wakeup task helper Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181114153706.GA11416@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).