From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: Do not rely on blk-mq for double completions
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:10:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181114181007.GD11416@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181114180018.GC11416@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:00:18AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 09:51:36AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Regarding this patch: I think this patch introduces a subtle but severe bug
> > in the SCSI core, namely that if an abort is processed concurrently with
> > request completion with "fake timeout" enabled that the abort is ignored.
>
> That requires the following occur concurrently:
>
> 1. A real completion
> 2. A real timeout
> 3. A fake timeout
>
> That can't happen on a production kernel, and highly improbable
> on the fake one. We can still fix it by having scsi timeout return
> BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER in this case. I didn't like adding code just to work
> around error injection, but there isn't a good alternative at the moment.
So do this instead:
--8<---
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
index ff372b335ced..d343024e732a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
@@ -199,9 +199,6 @@ scsi_abort_command(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
return FAILED;
}
- if (test_and_set_bit(__SCMD_COMPLETE, &scmd->flags))
- return SUCCESS;
-
spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
if (shost->eh_deadline != -1 && !shost->last_reset)
shost->last_reset = jiffies;
@@ -299,6 +296,8 @@ enum blk_eh_timer_return scsi_times_out(struct request *req)
rtn = host->hostt->eh_timed_out(scmd);
if (rtn == BLK_EH_DONE) {
+ if (test_and_set_bit(__SCMD_COMPLETE, &scmd->flags))
+ return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER;
if (scsi_abort_command(scmd) != SUCCESS) {
set_host_byte(scmd, DID_TIME_OUT);
scsi_eh_scmd_add(scmd);
-->8---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-14 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-14 16:25 [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: Return true if request was completed Keith Busch
2018-11-14 16:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi: Do not rely on blk-mq for double completions Keith Busch
2018-11-14 17:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-14 18:00 ` Keith Busch
2018-11-14 18:10 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-11-14 16:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Simplify request completion state Keith Busch
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-11-15 17:56 [PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: Return true if request was completed Keith Busch
2018-11-15 17:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi: Do not rely on blk-mq for double completions Keith Busch
2018-11-15 17:57 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181114181007.GD11416@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).