From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98715C43441 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 03:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4D5214F1 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 03:10:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6C4D5214F1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726807AbeKONQq (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:16:46 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41232 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726379AbeKONQq (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:16:46 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B812308626A; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 03:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ming.t460p (ovpn-8-17.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.8.17]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAFFC5D759; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 03:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 11:10:36 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Dave Chinner Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix 32 bit overflow in __blkdev_issue_discard() Message-ID: <20181115031035.GE32603@ming.t460p> References: <20181113214337.20581-1-david@fromorbit.com> <10a8dd78-7c00-8593-9f4e-b20eb1161b92@kernel.dk> <20181115010651.GD32603@ming.t460p> <20181115012201.GX19305@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181115012201.GX19305@dastard> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.49]); Thu, 15 Nov 2018 03:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:22:01PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 09:06:52AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 08:18:24AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On 11/13/18 2:43 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > From: Dave Chinner > > > > > > > > A discard cleanup merged into 4.20-rc2 causes fstests xfs/259 to > > > > fall into an endless loop in the discard code. The test is creating > > > > a device that is exactly 2^32 sectors in size to test mkfs boundary > > > > conditions around the 32 bit sector overflow region. > > > > > > > > mkfs issues a discard for the entire device size by default, and > > > > hence this throws a sector count of 2^32 into > > > > blkdev_issue_discard(). It takes the number of sectors to discard as > > > > a sector_t - a 64 bit value. > > > > > > > > The commit ba5d73851e71 ("block: cleanup __blkdev_issue_discard") > > > > takes this sector count and casts it to a 32 bit value before > > > > comapring it against the maximum allowed discard size the device > > > > has. This truncates away the upper 32 bits, and so if the lower 32 > > > > bits of the sector count is zero, it starts issuing discards of > > > > length 0. This causes the code to fall into an endless loop, issuing > > > > a zero length discards over and over again on the same sector. > > > > > > Applied, thanks. Ming, can you please add a blktests test for > > > this case? This is the 2nd time it's been broken. > > > > OK, I will add zram discard test in blktests, which should cover the > > 1st report. For the xfs/259, I need to investigate if it is easy to > > do in blktests. > > Just write a test that creates block devices of 2^32 + (-1,0,1) > sectors and runs a discard across the entire device. That's all that > xfs/259 it doing - exercising mkfs on 2TB, 4TB and 16TB boundaries. > i.e. the boundaries where sectors and page cache indexes (on 4k page > size systems) overflow 32 bit int and unsigned int sizes. mkfs > issues a discard for the entire device, so it's testing that as > well... Indeed, I can reproduce this issue via the following commands: modprobe scsi_debug virtual_gb=2049 sector_size=512 lbpws10=1 dev_size_mb=512 blkdiscard /dev/sde > > You need to write tests that exercise write_same, write_zeros and > discard operations around these boundaries, because they all take > a 64 bit sector count and stuff them into 32 bit size fields in > the bio tha tis being submitted. write_same/write_zeros are usually used by driver directly, so we may need make the test case on some specific device. Thanks, Ming