From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ide: don't acquire queue_lock in ide_complete_pm_rq
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:37:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181116083732.GR23828@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181116081006.5083-6-hch@lst.de>
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:10:05AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> blk_mq_stop_hw_queues doesn't need any locking, and the ide
> dev_flags field isn't protected by it either.
Is it a bug that dev_flags is no longer protected by queue_lock after
the mq conversion?
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> drivers/ide/ide-pm.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-pm.c b/drivers/ide/ide-pm.c
> index 56690f523100..192e6c65d34e 100644
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-pm.c
> @@ -201,7 +201,6 @@ void ide_complete_pm_rq(ide_drive_t *drive, struct request *rq)
> {
> struct request_queue *q = drive->queue;
> struct ide_pm_state *pm = ide_req(rq)->special;
> - unsigned long flags;
>
> ide_complete_power_step(drive, rq);
> if (pm->pm_step != IDE_PM_COMPLETED)
> @@ -211,12 +210,10 @@ void ide_complete_pm_rq(ide_drive_t *drive, struct request *rq)
> printk("%s: completing PM request, %s\n", drive->name,
> (ide_req(rq)->type == ATA_PRIV_PM_SUSPEND) ? "suspend" : "resume");
> #endif
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&q->queue_lock, flags);
> if (ide_req(rq)->type == ATA_PRIV_PM_SUSPEND)
> blk_mq_stop_hw_queues(q);
> else
> drive->dev_flags &= ~IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED;
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->queue_lock, flags);
>
> drive->hwif->rq = NULL;
>
> --
> 2.19.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-16 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-16 8:10 queue_lock fixups Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] block: remove the rq_alloc_data request_queue field Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:33 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-16 8:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] floppy: remove queue_lock around floppy_end_request Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:33 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-16 8:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] pktcdvd: remove queue_lock around blk_queue_max_hw_sectors Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:33 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-16 8:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] ide: don't acquire queue lock in ide_pm_execute_rq Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:34 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-16 8:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] ide: don't acquire queue_lock in ide_complete_pm_rq Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:37 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2018-11-16 8:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:42 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-16 8:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] mmc: stop abusing the request queue_lock pointer Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:51 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-17 10:12 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-11-16 16:17 ` queue_lock fixups Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181116083732.GR23828@vader \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox