From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ide: don't acquire queue_lock in ide_complete_pm_rq
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:42:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181116084222.GS23828@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181116084004.GA15331@lst.de>
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:40:04AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:37:32AM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 09:10:05AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > blk_mq_stop_hw_queues doesn't need any locking, and the ide
> > > dev_flags field isn't protected by it either.
> >
> > Is it a bug that dev_flags is no longer protected by queue_lock after
> > the mq conversion?
>
> Most if not all users weren't under queue_lock before. As far as I can
> tell it generally is set in the probe path, and without any obvious
> locking.
Good enough for me, you can add
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-16 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-16 8:10 queue_lock fixups Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] block: remove the rq_alloc_data request_queue field Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:33 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-16 8:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] floppy: remove queue_lock around floppy_end_request Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:33 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-16 8:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] pktcdvd: remove queue_lock around blk_queue_max_hw_sectors Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:33 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-16 8:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] ide: don't acquire queue lock in ide_pm_execute_rq Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:34 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-16 8:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] ide: don't acquire queue_lock in ide_complete_pm_rq Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:37 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-16 8:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:42 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2018-11-16 8:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] mmc: stop abusing the request queue_lock pointer Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 8:51 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-17 10:12 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-11-16 16:17 ` queue_lock fixups Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181116084222.GS23828@vader \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox