From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: use bd->last == true for list inserts
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:49:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181127234954.GF846@vader> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181126163556.5181-8-axboe@kernel.dk>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:35:55AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> If we are issuing a list of requests, we know if we're at the last one.
> If we fail issuing, ensure that we call ->commits_rqs() to flush any
> potential previous requests.
One comment below, otherwise
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 2 +-
> block/blk-mq.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> block/blk-mq.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index c9758d185357..808a65d23f1a 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ blk_status_t blk_insert_cloned_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *
> * bypass a potential scheduler on the bottom device for
> * insert.
> */
> - return blk_mq_request_issue_directly(rq);
> + return blk_mq_request_issue_directly(rq, true);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_insert_cloned_request);
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 6a249bf6ed00..0a12cec0b426 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1260,6 +1260,14 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list,
> if (!list_empty(list)) {
> bool needs_restart;
>
> + /*
> + * If we didn't flush the entire list, we could have told
> + * the driver there was more coming, but that turned out to
> + * be a lie.
> + */
> + if (q->mq_ops->commit_rqs)
> + q->mq_ops->commit_rqs(hctx);
> +
This hunk seems like it should go with the patch adding commit_rqs.
> spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
> list_splice_init(list, &hctx->dispatch);
> spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
> @@ -1736,12 +1744,12 @@ static blk_qc_t request_to_qc_t(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq)
>
> static blk_status_t __blk_mq_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> struct request *rq,
> - blk_qc_t *cookie)
> + blk_qc_t *cookie, bool last)
> {
> struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
> struct blk_mq_queue_data bd = {
> .rq = rq,
> - .last = true,
> + .last = last,
> };
> blk_qc_t new_cookie;
> blk_status_t ret;
> @@ -1776,7 +1784,7 @@ static blk_status_t __blk_mq_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> static blk_status_t __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> struct request *rq,
> blk_qc_t *cookie,
> - bool bypass_insert)
> + bool bypass_insert, bool last)
> {
> struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
> bool run_queue = true;
> @@ -1805,7 +1813,7 @@ static blk_status_t __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> goto insert;
> }
>
> - return __blk_mq_issue_directly(hctx, rq, cookie);
> + return __blk_mq_issue_directly(hctx, rq, cookie, last);
> insert:
> if (bypass_insert)
> return BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> @@ -1824,7 +1832,7 @@ static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>
> hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);
>
> - ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, cookie, false);
> + ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, cookie, false, true);
> if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE || ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE)
> blk_mq_sched_insert_request(rq, false, true, false);
> else if (ret != BLK_STS_OK)
> @@ -1833,7 +1841,7 @@ static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
> }
>
> -blk_status_t blk_mq_request_issue_directly(struct request *rq)
> +blk_status_t blk_mq_request_issue_directly(struct request *rq, bool last)
> {
> blk_status_t ret;
> int srcu_idx;
> @@ -1841,7 +1849,7 @@ blk_status_t blk_mq_request_issue_directly(struct request *rq)
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
>
> hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);
> - ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, &unused_cookie, true);
> + ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, &unused_cookie, true, last);
> hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
>
> return ret;
> @@ -1856,7 +1864,7 @@ void blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> queuelist);
>
> list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
> - ret = blk_mq_request_issue_directly(rq);
> + ret = blk_mq_request_issue_directly(rq, list_empty(list));
> if (ret != BLK_STS_OK) {
> if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE ||
> ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE) {
> @@ -1866,6 +1874,14 @@ void blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> blk_mq_end_request(rq, ret);
> }
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * If we didn't flush the entire list, we could have told
> + * the driver there was more coming, but that turned out to
> + * be a lie.
> + */
> + if (!list_empty(list) && hctx->queue->mq_ops->commit_rqs)
> + hctx->queue->mq_ops->commit_rqs(hctx);
> }
>
> static blk_qc_t blk_mq_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
> index 9ae8e9f8f8b1..7291e5379358 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.h
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ void blk_mq_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx,
> struct list_head *list);
>
> /* Used by blk_insert_cloned_request() to issue request directly */
> -blk_status_t blk_mq_request_issue_directly(struct request *rq);
> +blk_status_t blk_mq_request_issue_directly(struct request *rq, bool last);
> void blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> struct list_head *list);
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-27 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-26 16:35 [PATCHSET 0/8] block plugging improvements Jens Axboe
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 1/8] block: sum requests in the plug structure Jens Axboe
2018-11-26 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 2/8] block: improve logic around when to sort a plug list Jens Axboe
2018-11-27 23:31 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-27 23:49 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-27 23:55 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-27 23:59 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-28 0:05 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-28 0:16 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: add mq_ops->commit_rqs() Jens Axboe
2018-11-27 23:43 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-28 1:38 ` Ming Lei
2018-11-28 7:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-28 12:54 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 4/8] nvme: implement mq_ops->commit_rqs() hook Jens Axboe
2018-11-28 7:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-28 13:07 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 5/8] virtio_blk: " Jens Axboe
2018-11-27 23:45 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-28 3:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-11-28 2:10 ` Ming Lei
2018-11-28 2:34 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-29 1:23 ` Ming Lei
2018-11-29 2:19 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-29 2:51 ` Ming Lei
2018-11-29 3:13 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-29 3:27 ` Ming Lei
2018-11-29 3:53 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-28 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 6/8] ataflop: " Jens Axboe
2018-11-27 23:46 ` Omar Sandoval
2018-11-28 7:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-28 13:09 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: use bd->last == true for list inserts Jens Axboe
2018-11-27 23:49 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2018-11-27 23:51 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-28 1:49 ` Ming Lei
2018-11-28 2:37 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-26 16:35 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: add plug case for devices that implement ->commits_rqs() Jens Axboe
2018-11-28 7:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-28 13:11 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181127234954.GF846@vader \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox