linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: switch to per-cpu in-flight counters
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:04:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181130220423.GC15049@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a7c33ef-0bd0-d901-6a11-cffca1751b9e@kernel.dk>

On Fri, Nov 30 2018 at  4:52pm -0500,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:

> On 11/30/18 2:44 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27 2018 at  7:42pm -0500,
> > Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Now when part_round_stats is gone, we can switch to per-cpu in-flight
> >> counters.
> >>
> >> We use the local-atomic type local_t, so that if part_inc_in_flight or
> >> part_dec_in_flight is reentrantly called from an interrupt, the value will
> >> be correct.
> >>
> >> The other counters could be corrupted due to reentrant interrupt, but the
> >> corruption only results in slight counter skew - the in_flight counter
> >> must be exact, so it needs local_t.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>  block/bio.c           |    4 ++--
> >>  block/blk-core.c      |    4 ++--
> >>  block/blk-merge.c     |    2 +-
> >>  block/genhd.c         |   47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >>  drivers/md/dm.c       |    4 +---
> >>  include/linux/genhd.h |    7 ++++---
> >>  6 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Index: linux-block/block/genhd.c
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- linux-block.orig/block/genhd.c	2018-11-28 00:09:59.000000000 +0100
> >> +++ linux-block/block/genhd.c	2018-11-28 00:09:59.000000000 +0100
> >> @@ -45,53 +45,76 @@ static void disk_add_events(struct gendi
> >>  static void disk_del_events(struct gendisk *disk);
> >>  static void disk_release_events(struct gendisk *disk);
> >>  
> >> -void part_inc_in_flight(struct request_queue *q, struct hd_struct *part, int rw)
> >> +void part_inc_in_flight(struct request_queue *q, int cpu, struct hd_struct *part, int rw)
> >>  {
> >>  	if (queue_is_mq(q))
> >>  		return;
> >>  
> >> -	atomic_inc(&part->in_flight[rw]);
> >> +	local_inc(per_cpu_ptr(part->dkstats, cpu)->in_flight);
> >>  	if (part->partno)
> >> -		atomic_inc(&part_to_disk(part)->part0.in_flight[rw]);
> >> +		local_inc(per_cpu_ptr(part_to_disk(part)->part0.dkstats, cpu)->in_flight);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> -void part_dec_in_flight(struct request_queue *q, struct hd_struct *part, int rw)
> >> +void part_dec_in_flight(struct request_queue *q, int cpu, struct hd_struct *part, int rw)
> >>  {
> >>  	if (queue_is_mq(q))
> >>  		return;
> >>  
> >> -	atomic_dec(&part->in_flight[rw]);
> >> +	local_dec(per_cpu_ptr(part->dkstats, cpu)->in_flight);
> >>  	if (part->partno)
> >> -		atomic_dec(&part_to_disk(part)->part0.in_flight[rw]);
> >> +		local_dec(per_cpu_ptr(part_to_disk(part)->part0.dkstats, cpu)->in_flight);
> >>  }
> > 
> > 
> > The above is wrong, needs this incremental fix:
> 
> Should also be using this_cpu_inc/dec instead.

How so?  Mikulas is using local_t (original header speaks to why)

      reply	other threads:[~2018-11-30 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-28  0:42 [PATCH 2/3] block: switch to per-cpu in-flight counters Mikulas Patocka
2018-11-29 21:57 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-11-29 22:05   ` Mikulas Patocka
2018-11-29 22:22     ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-30  0:21     ` Mike Snitzer
2018-11-30 21:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2018-11-30 21:52   ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-30 22:04     ` Mike Snitzer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181130220423.GC15049@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).