From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E09FC04EB8 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 15:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6BC206B7 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 15:48:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2C6BC206B7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726420AbeLDPsq (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2018 10:48:46 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:59968 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726226AbeLDPsq (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2018 10:48:46 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Dec 2018 07:48:44 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,314,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="280857668" Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([10.232.112.69]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2018 07:48:45 -0800 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 08:46:00 -0700 From: Keith Busch To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: Hannes Reinecke , Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: Export iterating all tagged requests Message-ID: <20181204154559.GJ14775@localhost.localdomain> References: <20181130202635.11145-1-keith.busch@intel.com> <823fc3bf-78a4-c8fb-c80c-e3944f320af0@kernel.dk> <20181201164804.GB19557@lst.de> <9346f289-f265-e2ee-2d2c-c97973b45e23@suse.de> <8cd9a950-6605-6387-e4d4-4346a46da781@grimberg.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8cd9a950-6605-6387-e4d4-4346a46da781@grimberg.me> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 05:33:06PM -0800, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > >> > > Yes, I'm very much in favour of this, too. > > We always have this IMO slightly weird notion of stopping the queue, set > > some error flags in the driver, then _restarting_ the queue, just so > > that the driver then sees the error flag and terminates the requests. > > Which I always found quite counter-intuitive. > > What about requests that come in after the iteration runs? how are those > terminated? If we've reached a dead state, I think you'd want to start a queue freeze before running the terminating iterator.