From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: fix corruption with direct issue
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 17:38:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181205013821.GA19605@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d359819-5410-7af2-d02b-f0ecca39d2c9@kernel.dk>
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 03:47:46PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> If we attempt a direct issue to a SCSI device, and it returns BUSY, then
> we queue the request up normally. However, the SCSI layer may have
> already setup SG tables etc for this particular command. If we later
> merge with this request, then the old tables are no longer valid. Once
> we issue the IO, we only read/write the original part of the request,
> not the new state of it.
>
> This causes data corruption, and is most often noticed with the file
> system complaining about the just read data being invalid:
>
> [ 235.934465] EXT4-fs error (device sda1): ext4_iget:4831: inode #7142: comm dpkg-query: bad extra_isize 24937 (inode size 256)
>
> because most of it is garbage...
>
> This doesn't happen from the normal issue path, as we will simply defer
> the request to the hardware queue dispatch list if we fail. Once it's on
> the dispatch list, we never merge with it.
>
> Fix this from the direct issue path by flagging the request as
> REQ_NOMERGE so we don't change the size of it before issue.
>
> See also:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201685
>
> Fixes: 6ce3dd6eec1 ("blk-mq: issue directly if hw queue isn't busy in case of 'none'")
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
... on two systems affected by the problem.
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 3f91c6e5b17a..d8f518c6ea38 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1715,6 +1715,15 @@ static blk_status_t __blk_mq_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> break;
> case BLK_STS_RESOURCE:
> case BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE:
> + /*
> + * If direct dispatch fails, we cannot allow any merging on
> + * this IO. Drivers (like SCSI) may have set up permanent state
> + * for this request, like SG tables and mappings, and if we
> + * merge to it later on then we'll still only do IO to the
> + * original part.
> + */
> + rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_NOMERGE;
> +
> blk_mq_update_dispatch_busy(hctx, true);
> __blk_mq_requeue_request(rq);
> break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-05 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-04 22:47 [PATCH] blk-mq: fix corruption with direct issue Jens Axboe
2018-12-05 1:37 ` Ming Lei
2018-12-05 2:16 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-05 2:23 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-05 2:27 ` Ming Lei
2018-12-05 2:30 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-05 2:58 ` Ming Lei
2018-12-05 3:03 ` Ming Lei
2018-12-05 3:05 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-07 2:46 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-12-07 3:04 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-07 3:44 ` Ming Lei
2018-12-07 9:30 ` Ming Lei
2018-12-05 3:04 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-05 1:38 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2018-12-05 2:25 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-05 17:55 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-05 17:59 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-05 19:09 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-12-05 20:11 ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-05 14:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-12-05 15:15 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181205013821.GA19605@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox